Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork2.8k
feat(eslint-plugin): [naming-convention] improve performance by removing unnecessary selectors#6376
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Conversation
…ing unnecessary selectors
Thanks for the PR,@bradzacher! typescript-eslint is a 100% community driven project, and we are incredibly grateful that you are contributing to that community. The core maintainers work on this in their personal time, so please understand that it may not be possible for them to review your work immediately. Thanks again! 🙏Please, if you or your company is finding typescript-eslint valuable, help us sustain the project by sponsoring it transparently onhttps://opencollective.com/typescript-eslint. |
nx-cloudbot commentedJan 25, 2023 • edited
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
edited
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
netlifybot commentedJan 25, 2023 • edited
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
edited
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
✅ Deploy Preview fortypescript-eslint ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to yourNetlify site settings. |
codecovbot commentedJan 25, 2023 • edited
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
edited
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #6376 +/- ##==========================================+ Coverage 91.38% 91.51% +0.12%========================================== Files 368 368 Lines 12608 12584 -24 Branches 3713 3704 -9 ==========================================- Hits 11522 11516 -6+ Misses 770 752 -18 Partials 316 316
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown.Click here to find out more.
|
JoshuaKGoldberg left a comment• edited
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
edited
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
Love it!! ❤️🔥
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Part of my performance investigations on large codebases.
Right now we always register every single node selector in naming-convention, even if the user's config will never match that selector.
This is bad because eslint registers, parses and evaluates these selectors. All totalled these selectors combined pretty-well add up to every single identifier in the codebase!
Which is a lot of processing that's not required!
It's a simple change that can save 10s of seconds on codebases that don't use the
default
config selector.