Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

feat(eslint-plugin): [explicit-function-return-type] add allowIIFEs option#6237

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account

Merged
JoshuaKGoldberg merged 16 commits intotypescript-eslint:mainfromyeonjuan:fix/#6115
Feb 12, 2023

Conversation

yeonjuan
Copy link
Contributor

PR Checklist

Overview

@typescript-eslint
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the PR,@yeonjuan!

typescript-eslint is a 100% community driven project, and we are incredibly grateful that you are contributing to that community.

The core maintainers work on this in their personal time, so please understand that it may not be possible for them to review your work immediately.

Thanks again!


🙏Please, if you or your company is finding typescript-eslint valuable, help us sustain the project by sponsoring it transparently onhttps://opencollective.com/typescript-eslint.

@nx-cloud
Copy link

nx-cloudbot commentedDec 17, 2022
edited
Loading

☁️ Nx Cloud Report

CI is running/has finished running commands for commitf18a367. As they complete they will appear below. Click to see the status, the terminal output, and the build insights.

📂 See all runs for this branch


✅ Successfully ran 47 targets

Sent with 💌 fromNxCloud.

@netlify
Copy link

netlifybot commentedDec 17, 2022
edited
Loading

Deploy Preview fortypescript-eslint ready!

NameLink
🔨 Latest commitf18a367
🔍 Latest deploy loghttps://app.netlify.com/sites/typescript-eslint/deploys/63e924cb75acbc000848b2bb
😎 Deploy Previewhttps://deploy-preview-6237--typescript-eslint.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to yourNetlify site settings.

@codecov
Copy link

codecovbot commentedDec 17, 2022
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

Merging#6237 (1c702dc) intomain (766ab1d) willincrease coverage by0.00%.
The diff coverage is100.00%.

❗ Current head1c702dc differs from pull request most recent headf18a367. Consider uploading reports for the commitf18a367 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@##             main    #6237   +/-   ##=======================================  Coverage   90.61%   90.61%           =======================================  Files         372      372             Lines       12709    12712    +3       Branches     3739     3740    +1     =======================================+ Hits        11516    11519    +3  Misses        853      853             Partials      340      340
FlagCoverage Δ
unittest90.61% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown.Click here to find out more.

Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
...-plugin/src/rules/explicit-function-return-type.ts97.95% <100.00%> (+0.13%)⬆️

Copy link
Member

@JoshuaKGoldbergJoshuaKGoldberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

Looks lovely to start! Just requesting a bit more test coverage please. 🙌

endColumn: 22,
},
],
},

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

Let's add a bit more test coverage:

  • IIFEs with return types
  • Multiple levels of IIFEs (e.g.(() => () => {})()())
  • Arguments & parameters

@JoshuaKGoldbergJoshuaKGoldberg added the awaiting responseIssues waiting for a reply from the OP or another party labelDec 17, 2022
{
filename: 'test.ts',
code: `
let foo = (() => () => {})()();
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

@JoshuaKGoldberg
How should we handle multiple levels of IIFEs? For now, it allows only if the function is called directly.

constfoo=(()=>()=>"foo")()();// errorconstbar=(()=>(()=>"foo")())();// pass

Should both cases be passed when theallowIIFEs option is true?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

@yeonjuan The first one IMO is not an "IIFE" by definition—(() => () => "foo")() is an expression that happens to evaluate to a function, not a function expression itself. It's fine if we don't handle it.

yeonjuan, bradzacher, and JoshuaKGoldberg reacted with thumbs up emoji
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

I would agree with that assessment.
The inner function is not an IIFE, just the outer function.

@bradzacherbradzacher removed the awaiting responseIssues waiting for a reply from the OP or another party labelJan 19, 2023
@bradzacherbradzacher added the enhancement: plugin rule optionNew rule option for an existing eslint-plugin rule labelJan 30, 2023
@JoshuaKGoldbergJoshuaKGoldberg added the awaiting responseIssues waiting for a reply from the OP or another party labelFeb 5, 2023
@JoshuaKGoldberg
Copy link
Member

👋 ping@yeonjuan, is this still something you have time for? And if so, do you have all the answers you need?

@yeonjuan
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

yeonjuan commentedFeb 5, 2023
edited
Loading

@JoshuaKGoldberg Sorry for the late, I missed some comment notifications. I'll work on this in this week!

JoshuaKGoldberg
JoshuaKGoldberg previously approved these changesFeb 12, 2023
Copy link
Member

@JoshuaKGoldbergJoshuaKGoldberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

Super thanks@yeonjuan! 🚀

This is looking great - I'll do the one probably-doesn't-matter touchup and merge.

@JoshuaKGoldbergJoshuaKGoldberg merged commita1b3f7b intotypescript-eslint:mainFeb 12, 2023
crapStone pushed a commit to Calciumdibromid/CaBr2 that referenced this pull requestFeb 14, 2023
This PR contains the following updates:| Package | Type | Update | Change ||---|---|---|---|| [@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin](https://github.com/typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint) | devDependencies | minor | [`5.51.0` -> `5.52.0`](https://renovatebot.com/diffs/npm/@typescript-eslint%2feslint-plugin/5.51.0/5.52.0) || [@typescript-eslint/parser](https://github.com/typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint) | devDependencies | minor | [`5.51.0` -> `5.52.0`](https://renovatebot.com/diffs/npm/@typescript-eslint%2fparser/5.51.0/5.52.0) |---### Release Notes<details><summary>typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@&#8203;typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin)</summary>### [`v5.52.0`](https://github.com/typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint/blob/HEAD/packages/eslint-plugin/CHANGELOG.md#&#8203;5520-httpsgithubcomtypescript-eslinttypescript-eslintcomparev5510v5520-2023-02-13)[Compare Source](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint@v5.51.0...v5.52.0)##### Bug Fixes-   **eslint-plugin:** \[no-import-type-side-effects] correctly ignore zero-specifier imports ([#&#8203;6444](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#6444)) ([d5a6688](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint@d5a6688))-   **eslint-plugin:** \[no-unnecessary-condition] account for optional chaining on potentially void values ([#&#8203;6432](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#6432)) ([e1d9c67](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint@e1d9c67)), closes [#&#8203;5255](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#5255)-   **eslint-plugin:** \[no-unnecessary-condition] fix false positive when checking indexed access types ([#&#8203;6452](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#6452)) ([d569924](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint@d569924))-   **eslint-plugin:** fix key-spacing when type starts on next line ([#&#8203;6412](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#6412)) ([3eb2eed](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint@3eb2eed))##### Features-   **eslint-plugin:** \[block-spacing] extending base rule for TS related blocks ([#&#8203;6195](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#6195)) ([b2db3f5](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint@b2db3f5))-   **eslint-plugin:** \[explicit-function-return-type] add allowFunctionsWithoutTypeParameters option ([#&#8203;6105](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#6105)) ([113640e](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint@113640e))-   **eslint-plugin:** \[explicit-function-return-type] add allowIIFEs option ([#&#8203;6237](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#6237)) ([a1b3f7b](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint@a1b3f7b))</details><details><summary>typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@&#8203;typescript-eslint/parser)</summary>### [`v5.52.0`](https://github.com/typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint/blob/HEAD/packages/parser/CHANGELOG.md#&#8203;5520-httpsgithubcomtypescript-eslinttypescript-eslintcomparev5510v5520-2023-02-13)[Compare Source](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint@v5.51.0...v5.52.0)**Note:** Version bump only for package [@&#8203;typescript-eslint/parser](https://github.com/typescript-eslint/parser)</details>---### Configuration📅 **Schedule**: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).🚦 **Automerge**: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.♻ **Rebasing**: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.🔕 **Ignore**: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.--- - [ ] <!-- rebase-check -->If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box---This PR has been generated by [Renovate Bot](https://github.com/renovatebot/renovate).<!--renovate-debug:eyJjcmVhdGVkSW5WZXIiOiIzNC4xMzMuMCIsInVwZGF0ZWRJblZlciI6IjM0LjEzNi4wIn0=-->Co-authored-by: cabr2-bot <cabr2.help@gmail.com>Reviewed-on:https://codeberg.org/Calciumdibromid/CaBr2/pulls/1784Reviewed-by: Epsilon_02 <epsilon_02@noreply.codeberg.org>Co-authored-by: Calciumdibromid Bot <cabr2_bot@noreply.codeberg.org>Co-committed-by: Calciumdibromid Bot <cabr2_bot@noreply.codeberg.org>
@github-actionsgithub-actionsbot locked asresolvedand limited conversation to collaboratorsFeb 20, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in.
Reviewers

@bradzacherbradzacherbradzacher left review comments

@Josh-CenaJosh-CenaJosh-Cena left review comments

@JoshuaKGoldbergJoshuaKGoldbergJoshuaKGoldberg approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
awaiting responseIssues waiting for a reply from the OP or another partyenhancement: plugin rule optionNew rule option for an existing eslint-plugin rule
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Enhancement: [explicit-function-return-type] add option to ignore IIFEs
4 participants
@yeonjuan@JoshuaKGoldberg@bradzacher@Josh-Cena

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp