Aug 29, 2022 · Aug 29, 2022
diff --git a/packages/eslint-plugin/docs/rules/prefer-optional-chain.md b/packages/eslint-plugin/docs/rules/prefer-optional-chain.md
 ---
 description: 'Enforce using concise optional chain expressions instead of chained logical ands, negated logical ors, or empty objects.'
 description: 'Enforce using concise optional chain expressions instead of chained logical ands.'
 ---

 > 🛑 This file is source code, not the primary documentation location! 🛑
 foo && foo['a'] && foo['a'].b && foo['a'].b.c;
 foo && foo.a && foo.a.b && foo.a.b.method && foo.a.b.method();

 // With empty objects
 (((foo || {}).a || {}).b || {}).c;
 (((foo || {})['a'] || {}).b || {}).c;

 // With negated `or`s
 !foo || !foo.bar;
 !foo || !foo[bar];
 !foo || !foo.bar || !foo.bar.baz || !foo.bar.baz();

 // this rule also supports converting chained strict nullish checks:
 foo &&
  foo.a != null &&
 foo?.a?.b?.method?.();

 foo?.a?.b?.c?.d?.e;

 !foo?.bar;
 !foo?.[bar];
 !foo?.bar?.baz?.();
 ```

 **Note:** there are a few edge cases where this rule will false positive. Use your best judgement when evaluating reported errors.
Original file line number	Diff line number	Diff line change
		@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
		---
		description: 'Enforce using concise optional chain expressions instead of chained logical ands, negated logical ors, or empty objects.'
		description: 'Enforce using concise optional chain expressions instead of chained logical ands.'
		---

		> 🛑 This file is source code, not the primary documentation location! 🛑
Expand DownExpand Up		@@ -65,15 +65,9 @@ foo && foo.a && foo.a.b && foo.a.b.c;
		foo && foo['a'] && foo['a'].b && foo['a'].b.c;
		foo && foo.a && foo.a.b && foo.a.b.method && foo.a.b.method();

		// With empty objects
		(((foo \|\| {}).a \|\| {}).b \|\| {}).c;
		(((foo \|\| {})['a'] \|\| {}).b \|\| {}).c;

		// With negated `or`s
		!foo \|\| !foo.bar;
		!foo \|\| !foo[bar];
		!foo \|\| !foo.bar \|\| !foo.bar.baz \|\| !foo.bar.baz();

		// this rule also supports converting chained strict nullish checks:
		foo &&
		foo.a != null &&
Expand All		@@ -91,10 +85,6 @@ foo?.['a']?.b?.c;
		foo?.a?.b?.method?.();

		foo?.a?.b?.c?.d?.e;

		!foo?.bar;
		!foo?.[bar];
		!foo?.bar?.baz?.();
		```

		Note: there are a few edge cases where this rule will false positive. Use your best judgement when evaluating reported errors.
Expand Down