Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

fix(eslint-plugin): [return-await] correct autofixer in binary expression#4401

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account

Conversation

islandryu
Copy link
Contributor

@islandryuislandryu commentedJan 7, 2022
edited
Loading

PR Checklist

Overview

@typescript-eslint
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the PR,@islandryu!

typescript-eslint is a 100% community driven project, and we are incredibly grateful that you are contributing to that community.

The core maintainers work on this in their personal time, so please understand that it may not be possible for them to review your work immediately.

Thanks again!


🙏Please, if you or your company is finding typescript-eslint valuable, help us sustain the project by sponsoring it transparently onhttps://opencollective.com/typescript-eslint. As a thank you, your profile/company logo will be added to our main README which receives thousands of unique visitorsper day.

@nx-cloud
Copy link

nx-cloudbot commentedJan 7, 2022
edited
Loading

☁️ Nx Cloud Report

CI ran the following commands for commitdbf7e4a. Click to see the status, the terminal output, and the build insights.

📂 See all runs for this branch


✅ Successfully ran 48 targets

Sent with 💌 fromNxCloud.

@netlify
Copy link

netlifybot commentedJan 7, 2022
edited
Loading

✔️ Deploy Preview fortypescript-eslint ready!

🔨 Explore the source changes:dbf7e4a

🔍 Inspect the deploy log:https://app.netlify.com/sites/typescript-eslint/deploys/61fbf2cedc89960007dc0c8a

😎 Browse the preview:https://deploy-preview-4401--typescript-eslint.netlify.app

@codecov
Copy link

codecovbot commentedJan 7, 2022
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

Merging#4401 (dbf7e4a) intomain (63fbbaa) willincrease coverage by1.81%.
The diff coverage is65.71%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@##             main    #4401      +/-   ##==========================================+ Coverage   92.49%   94.30%   +1.81%==========================================  Files         346      148     -198       Lines       11684     7943    -3741       Branches     3335     2535     -800     ==========================================- Hits        10807     7491    -3316+ Misses        608      255     -353+ Partials      269      197      -72
FlagCoverage Δ
unittest94.30% <65.71%> (+1.81%)⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown.Click here to find out more.

Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
...es/eslint-plugin/src/util/getOperatorPrecedence.ts60.00% <60.00%> (ø)
packages/eslint-plugin/src/rules/return-await.ts99.06% <100.00%> (+0.05%)⬆️
packages/utils/src/ts-eslint/Scope.ts
packages/scope-manager/src/lib/es2021.promise.ts
packages/utils/src/eslint-utils/nullThrows.ts
...ckages/utils/src/ts-eslint-scope/PatternVisitor.ts
packages/type-utils/src/requiresQuoting.ts
packages/utils/src/ts-eslint-scope/Reference.ts
packages/typescript-estree/src/ts-estree/index.ts
.../scope-manager/src/variable/ImplicitLibVariable.ts
... and191 more

@bradzacherbradzacher added the bugSomething isn't working labelJan 11, 2022
@bradzacherbradzacher changed the titlefix(eslint-plugin): return-await in binary expressionfix(eslint-plugin): [return-await] correct autofixer in binary expressionJan 11, 2022
@islandryuislandryuforce-pushed thefixReturnAwaitInBinaryExpression branch 2 times, most recently fromdef7c60 to4477fb7CompareJanuary 14, 2022 13:08
@islandryu
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

I'm sorry.
I did a forcepush by mistake.
I didn't change anything.

Copy link
Member

@bradzacherbradzacher left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

Thanks for the PR!

This is definitely a good start - but the problem is that there are a lot of cases that it won't handle properly.

The problem we're trying to solve here is that of "precedence" - meaning we need to check if the thing on the right has a lower precedence than theawait we're inserting. If it has a lower precedence, then it is evaluated after the await. If it has a higher precedence, then it is evaluated before the await.

Luckily this problem is already solved for us, to some degree:
https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/blob/af689cc5d527789cbc1d18a7b8aae6fa46051ea7/src/compiler/utilities.ts#L3446-L3783

All of this code is specifically built for TS nodes. Additionally it's all internal to TS (so we can't use it anyways). It would be a good idea for us to maintain a copy of this for ourselves using ourAST_NODE_TYPES (and with a non-const enum). We can place this function in theutils package so anyone can consume it easily.


As an example - from the above code we can see thatBinaryExpression has a precedence ofOperatorPrecedence.Coalesce (or4), whereasAwaitExpression has a precedence ofOperatorPrecedence.Unary (or16)

This means thatAwaitExpression has a higher precedence thanBinaryExpression - thus it is evaluated first.
So by evaluating the precedences, we know that before we insert anawait we must wrap the childBinaryExpression in parentheses so that it is evaluated correctly.

This system handles all cases correctly and saves us having to manually handle individual cases.

islandryu reacted with thumbs up emoji
@bradzacherbradzacher added the awaiting responseIssues waiting for a reply from the OP or another party labelJan 17, 2022
@islandryu
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

islandryu commentedJan 18, 2022
edited
Loading

@bradzacher
Thanks for the review.
Am I correct in my understanding?

// CallExpression has a higher precedence than awaitExpression, so () is not necessary.// inputreturna();// expected outputreturnawaita();// All binaryExpression has a lower precedence than awaitExpression, so () is necessary.// inputreturna()||undefinedreturnundefined||a()returnundefined??a()// expected outputreturnawait(a()||undefined)returnawait(undefined||a())returnawait(undefined??a())// AsExpression has a lower precedence than awaitExpression, so () is necessary.// inputreturna()asT// expected outputreturnawait(a()asT)...

@bradzacher
Copy link
Member

You are correct!
By inspecting the precedence we can determine whether or not we need parentheses at all.

@bradzacherbradzacher removed the awaiting responseIssues waiting for a reply from the OP or another party labelJan 19, 2022
@islandryu
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

I could not test all of getOperatorPrecedence.ts with return-await alone.

bradzacher reacted with thumbs up emoji

Copy link
Member

@bradzacherbradzacher left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

this is looking good to me - this is awesome!
thanks so much for improving the fixer here and adding utils!

fregante reacted with hooray emoji
@bradzacherbradzacher merged commit5fa2fad intotypescript-eslint:mainMar 1, 2022
crapStone pushed a commit to Calciumdibromid/CaBr2 that referenced this pull requestMar 8, 2022
This PR contains the following updates:| Package | Type | Update | Change ||---|---|---|---|| [@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin](https://github.com/typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint) | devDependencies | minor | [`5.13.0` -> `5.14.0`](https://renovatebot.com/diffs/npm/@typescript-eslint%2feslint-plugin/5.13.0/5.14.0) || [@typescript-eslint/parser](https://github.com/typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint) | devDependencies | minor | [`5.13.0` -> `5.14.0`](https://renovatebot.com/diffs/npm/@typescript-eslint%2fparser/5.13.0/5.14.0) |---### Release Notes<details><summary>typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@&#8203;typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin)</summary>### [`v5.14.0`](https://github.com/typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint/blob/HEAD/packages/eslint-plugin/CHANGELOG.md#&#8203;5140-httpsgithubcomtypescript-eslinttypescript-eslintcomparev5130v5140-2022-03-07)[Compare Source](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint@v5.13.0...v5.14.0)##### Bug Fixes-   **eslint-plugin:** \[naming-convention] cover case that requires quotes ([#&#8203;4582](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#4582)) ([3ea0947](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint@3ea0947))-   **eslint-plugin:** \[no-misused-promises] factor thenable returning function overload signatures ([#&#8203;4620](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#4620)) ([56a09e9](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint@56a09e9))-   **eslint-plugin:** \[prefer-readonly-parameter-types] handle class sharp private field and member without throwing error ([#&#8203;4343](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#4343)) ([a65713a](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint@a65713a))-   **eslint-plugin:** \[return-await] correct autofixer in binary expression ([#&#8203;4401](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#4401)) ([5fa2fad](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint@5fa2fad))##### Features-   **eslint-plugin:** \[no-misused-promises] add granular options within `checksVoidReturns` ([#&#8203;4623](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#4623)) ([1085177](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint@1085177))</details><details><summary>typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@&#8203;typescript-eslint/parser)</summary>### [`v5.14.0`](https://github.com/typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint/blob/HEAD/packages/parser/CHANGELOG.md#&#8203;5140-httpsgithubcomtypescript-eslinttypescript-eslintcomparev5130v5140-2022-03-07)[Compare Source](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint@v5.13.0...v5.14.0)**Note:** Version bump only for package [@&#8203;typescript-eslint/parser](https://github.com/typescript-eslint/parser)</details>---### Configuration📅 **Schedule**: At any time (no schedule defined).🚦 **Automerge**: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.♻ **Rebasing**: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.🔕 **Ignore**: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.--- - [ ] <!-- rebase-check -->If you want to rebase/retry this PR, click this checkbox.---This PR has been generated by [Renovate Bot](https://github.com/renovatebot/renovate).Co-authored-by: cabr2-bot <cabr2.help@gmail.com>Reviewed-on:https://codeberg.org/Calciumdibromid/CaBr2/pulls/1201Reviewed-by: 6543 <6543@noreply.codeberg.org>Co-authored-by: Calciumdibromid Bot <cabr2_bot@noreply.codeberg.org>Co-committed-by: Calciumdibromid Bot <cabr2_bot@noreply.codeberg.org>
@github-actionsgithub-actionsbot locked asresolvedand limited conversation to collaboratorsMay 25, 2022
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in.
Reviewers

@bradzacherbradzacherbradzacher approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
bugSomething isn't working
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[return-await] wrong autofix ofreturn undefined ?? promise toreturn await undefined ?? promise
2 participants
@islandryu@bradzacher

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp