Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork2.8k
chore(eslint-plugin): remove lodash from dependencies#3478
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
chore(eslint-plugin): remove lodash from dependencies#3478
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Conversation
Thanks for the PR,@SukkaW! typescript-eslint is a 100% community driven project, and we are incredibly grateful that you are contributing to that community. The core maintainers work on this in their personal time, so please understand that it may not be possible for them to review your work immediately. Thanks again! 🙏Please, if you or your company is finding typescript-eslint valuable, help us sustain the project by sponsoring it transparently onhttps://opencollective.com/typescript-eslint. As a thank you, your profile/company logo will be added to our main README which receives thousands of unique visitorsper day. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
38d3d4f to80ac539CompareCodecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@## master #3478 +/- ##==========================================- Coverage 92.66% 92.63% -0.03%========================================== Files 324 326 +2 Lines 11188 11240 +52 Branches 3157 3170 +13 ==========================================+ Hits 10367 10412 +45- Misses 365 368 +3- Partials 456 460 +4
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown.Click here to find out more.
|
bradzacher left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
thanks!
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
It is not necessary to add a full lodash as a dependency just for escaping RegExp, right?