Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork2.8k
fix(typescript-estree): useTSEmptyBodyFunctionExpression
for body-less nodes#1289
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
fix(typescript-estree): useTSEmptyBodyFunctionExpression
for body-less nodes#1289
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Conversation
Thanks for the PR,@G-Rath! typescript-eslint is a 100% community driven project, and we are incredibly grateful that you are contributing to that community. The core maintainers work on this in their personal time, so please understand that it may not be possible for them to review your work immediately. Thanks again! 🙏Please, if you or your company is finding typescript-eslint valuable, help us sustain the project by sponsoring it transparently onhttps://opencollective.com/typescript-eslint. As a thank you, your profile/company logo will be added to our main README which receives thousands of unique visitorsper day. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
This overall LGTM, but it is technically a breaking change for direct consumers of I'm thinking we should probably look to doing a 3.0.0 release v soon, as the number of things is starting to reach a decent sized pile (see the milestone) cc@JamesHenry |
G-Rath commentedDec 4, 2019 • edited by bradzacher
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
edited by bradzacher
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
@bradzacher not entirely sure what I can do about the diff coverage, as it doesn't seem to like the fact that I force pushed, and removed so many lines from I can't find a nice chunk where I'm missing coverage that I can hit easily :/ |
@G-Rath Just one branch codecov doesn't think you've tested. Also please be careful with your @ tagging. My username isn't the first "brad" username alphabetically, and github isn't smart enough to be contextually aware. (I've emailed them about it, but they are yet to fix it..) |
@bradzacher Turns out that wasn't actually needed - Let me know if there's any other changes you'd like made for this 😄 Also cheers for pointing out the wrong tagging 😬 |
codecovbot commentedJan 12, 2020 • edited
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
edited
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@## v3 #1289 +/- ##==========================================- Coverage 93.91% 93.87% -0.04%========================================== Files 171 172 +1 Lines 7787 7805 +18 Branches 2238 2240 +2 ==========================================+ Hits 7313 7327 +14- Misses 217 221 +4 Partials 257 257
|
TSEmptyBodyFunctionExpression
for body-less nodesTSEmptyBodyFunctionExpression
for body-less nodes…-TSEmptyBodyFunctionExpression
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
BREAKING CHANGE:
Fixes#734