Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork2.8k
chore: check variable declaration syntax error against tsNode#11778
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
base:main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Thanks for the PR,@fisker! typescript-eslint is a 100% community driven project, and we are incredibly grateful that you are contributing to that community. The core maintainers work on this in their personal time, so please understand that it may not be possible for them to review your work immediately. Thanks again! 🙏Please, if you or your company is finding typescript-eslint valuable, help us sustain the project by sponsoring it transparently onhttps://opencollective.com/typescript-eslint. |
netlifybot commentedNov 23, 2025 • edited
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
edited
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
✅ Deploy Preview fortypescript-eslint ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to yourNetlify project configuration. |
nx-cloudbot commentedNov 23, 2025 • edited
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
edited
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
View yourCI Pipeline Execution ↗ for commit0cf79f9
☁️Nx Cloud last updated this comment at |
codecovbot commentedNov 23, 2025 • edited
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
edited
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
❌ Your patch check has failed because the patch coverage (51.25%) is below the target coverage (90.00%). You can increase the patch coverage or adjust thetarget coverage. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #11778 +/- ##==========================================- Coverage 90.57% 90.50% -0.07%========================================== Files 522 522 Lines 53079 53365 +286 Branches 8842 8912 +70 ==========================================+ Hits 48074 48300 +226- Misses 4989 5051 +62+ Partials 16 14 -2
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown.Click here to find out more.
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
JoshuaKGoldberg left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
This seems reasonable to me, thanks!
+1 to merging in#11777 first.

Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
PR Checklist
Overview
Same as#11777
No logic changes, just refactor.
Note: this contains changes from#11777, but fixed both
VariableDeclaration,VariableDeclarationList, andVariableStatement.If smaller changes are preferred, I'll rebase after#11777 gets merged.