Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork2.8k
fix(scope-manager): change unhelpfulaaa error message and changeanalyze to expectsProgram#11747
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
base:main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Thanks for the PR,@nayounsang! typescript-eslint is a 100% community driven project, and we are incredibly grateful that you are contributing to that community. The core maintainers work on this in their personal time, so please understand that it may not be possible for them to review your work immediately. Thanks again! 🙏Please, if you or your company is finding typescript-eslint valuable, help us sustain the project by sponsoring it transparently onhttps://opencollective.com/typescript-eslint. |
netlifybot commentedNov 9, 2025 • edited
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
edited
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
✅ Deploy Preview fortypescript-eslint ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to yourNetlify project configuration. |
nx-cloudbot commentedNov 9, 2025 • edited
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
edited
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
View yourCI Pipeline Execution ↗ for commit1282ebc
☁️Nx Cloud last updated this comment at |
scope-manager throws unhelpfulaaa error message becauseanalyze expectsProgramaaa error message becauseanalyze expectsProgramaaa error message becauseanalyze expectsProgramaaa error message becauseanalyze expectsProgramCodecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #11747 +/- ##======================================= Coverage 90.66% 90.67% ======================================= Files 518 518 Lines 52444 52447 +3 Branches 8690 8691 +1 =======================================+ Hits 47548 47554 +6+ Misses 4882 4879 -3 Partials 14 14
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown.Click here to find out more.
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
aaa error message becauseanalyze expectsProgramaaa error message andanalyze to expectsProgramaaa error message andanalyze to expectsProgramaaa error message and changeanalyze to expectsProgramnayounsang commentedNov 10, 2025 • edited
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
edited
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
range doesn't related to the issue. constbodyStart=this.block.body?.range[0]??-1; // It's invalid resolution in the following case:return!((variable.scope===this&&ref.identifier.range[0]<bodyStart&&// the reference is in the parameter part.variable.defs.every(d=>d.name.range[0]>=bodyStart))// the variable is in the body.); |

Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
PR Checklist
aaaerror message #11727Overview
aaaSince changed the type of
analyze, I'm wondering if it's correct to write the test as it is now.(I don't know if that makes sense!)Furthermore, this error message was caused by passing a Node instead of a Program, so is an error message even necessary?