Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

fix(scope-manager): reconcile type-value distinction for implicit globals across libs#11715

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account

Open
lilnasy wants to merge3 commits intotypescript-eslint:main
base:main
Choose a base branch
Loading
fromlilnasy:main

Conversation

@lilnasy
Copy link

PR Checklist

Overview

To fix the issue, implicit variables are mutated as the global scope is being populated.

I admittedly did not spend much time thinking of a proper solution. Though it was tricky to pinpoint, the fix is simple. I imagine the "correct" location for the fix is a matter of maintainer preference.

Direct commits from maintainers welcome.

@typescript-eslint
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the PR,@lilnasy!

typescript-eslint is a 100% community driven project, and we are incredibly grateful that you are contributing to that community.

The core maintainers work on this in their personal time, so please understand that it may not be possible for them to review your work immediately.

Thanks again!


🙏Please, if you or your company is finding typescript-eslint valuable, help us sustain the project by sponsoring it transparently onhttps://opencollective.com/typescript-eslint.

@netlify
Copy link

netlifybot commentedOct 23, 2025
edited
Loading

Deploy Preview fortypescript-eslint ready!

NameLink
🔨 Latest commit191576b
🔍 Latest deploy loghttps://app.netlify.com/projects/typescript-eslint/deploys/6909042b0c22e70008308511
😎 Deploy Previewhttps://deploy-preview-11715--typescript-eslint.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.
Lighthouse
Lighthouse
1 paths audited
Performance: 98 (🟢 up 2 from production)
Accessibility: 97 (no change from production)
Best Practices: 100 (no change from production)
SEO: 92 (no change from production)
PWA: 80 (no change from production)
View the detailed breakdown and full score reports

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to yourNetlify project configuration.

@lilnasylilnasy changed the titlefix(scope manager): reconcile type-value distinction for implicit globals across libsfix(scope-manager): reconcile type-value distinction for implicit globals across libsOct 23, 2025
@nx-cloud
Copy link

nx-cloudbot commentedOct 23, 2025
edited
Loading

🤖 Nx Cloud AI Fix Eligible

An automatically generated fix could have helped fix failing tasks for this run, but Self-healing CI is disabled for this workspace. Visit workspace settings to enable it and get automatic fixes in future runs.

To disable these notifications, a workspace admin can disable themin workspace settings.


View yourCI Pipeline Execution ↗ for commit191576b

CommandStatusDurationResult
nx run-many -t lint❌ Failed3m 17sView ↗
nx test eslint-plugin --coverage=false✅ Succeeded5m 17sView ↗
nx run-many -t typecheck✅ Succeeded2m 7sView ↗
nx run types:build✅ Succeeded5sView ↗
nx run integration-tests:test✅ Succeeded5sView ↗
nx test eslint-plugin-internal --coverage=false✅ Succeeded10sView ↗
nx test typescript-estree --coverage=false✅ Succeeded2sView ↗
nx run generate-configs✅ Succeeded6sView ↗
Additional runs (29)✅ Succeeded...View ↗

☁️Nx Cloud last updated this comment at2025-11-03 19:53:23 UTC

@codecov
Copy link

codecovbot commentedOct 23, 2025
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 90.66%. Comparing base (ea2ee6b) to head (191576b).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@##             main   #11715   +/-   ##=======================================  Coverage   90.66%   90.66%           =======================================  Files         518      518             Lines       52435    52445   +10       Branches     8686     8690    +4     =======================================+ Hits        47541    47551   +10- Misses       4880     4881    +1+ Partials       14       13    -1
FlagCoverage Δ
unittest90.66% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown.Click here to find out more.

Files with missing linesCoverage Δ
packages/scope-manager/src/scope/ScopeBase.ts96.04% <100.00%> (+0.12%)⬆️
.../scope-manager/src/variable/ImplicitLibVariable.ts87.50% <100.00%> (ø)
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Copy link
Member

@bradzacherbradzacher left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

instead of mutating the variable here -- could we instead do it higher.

eg:

In theGlobalScope class (which callsScopeBase.defineVariable):

publicdefineImplicitVariable(
name:string,
options:ImplicitLibVariableOptions,
):void{
this.defineVariable(
newImplicitLibVariable(this,name,options),
this.set,
this.variables,
null,
null,
);
}

Or in theReferencer class (which callsGlobalScope.defineImplicitVariable):

// This loop is guaranteed to see each included lib exactly once
for(const[name,variable]oflib.variables){
globalScope.defineImplicitVariable(name,variable);
}

I think the latter would be better as we could pre-aggregate the variable definitions to deduplicate and merge them before even callingdefineImplicitVariable.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@bradzacherbradzacherbradzacher requested changes

Requested changes must be addressed to merge this pull request.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Scope Manager fails to pick up references to implicit globals

3 participants

@lilnasy@bradzacher@JoshuaKGoldberg

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp