Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

fix(eslint-plugin): [prefer-return-this-type] don't report an error when returning a union type that includes a classType#11432

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account

Merged
JoshuaKGoldberg merged 4 commits intotypescript-eslint:mainfrommdm317:fix-11225
Sep 8, 2025

Conversation

mdm317
Copy link
Contributor

PR Checklist

Overview

Don't report an error when returning a union type that includes aclassType.

@typescript-eslint
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the PR,@mdm317!

typescript-eslint is a 100% community driven project, and we are incredibly grateful that you are contributing to that community.

The core maintainers work on this in their personal time, so please understand that it may not be possible for them to review your work immediately.

Thanks again!


🙏Please, if you or your company is finding typescript-eslint valuable, help us sustain the project by sponsoring it transparently onhttps://opencollective.com/typescript-eslint.

@netlifyNetlify
Copy link

netlifybot commentedJul 29, 2025
edited
Loading

Deploy Preview fortypescript-eslint ready!

NameLink
🔨 Latest commit9a559d3
🔍 Latest deploy loghttps://app.netlify.com/projects/typescript-eslint/deploys/68bee3f9e09a6400085911d6
😎 Deploy Previewhttps://deploy-preview-11432--typescript-eslint.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.
Lighthouse
Lighthouse
1 paths audited
Performance: 75 (🔴 down 22 from production)
Accessibility: 97 (no change from production)
Best Practices: 100 (no change from production)
SEO: 92 (no change from production)
PWA: 80 (no change from production)
View the detailed breakdown and full score reports

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to yourNetlify project configuration.

@nx-cloudNx Cloud
Copy link

nx-cloudbot commentedJul 29, 2025
edited
Loading

View yourCI Pipeline Execution ↗ for commit9a559d3

CommandStatusDurationResult
nx test eslint-plugin --coverage=false✅ Succeeded5m 6sView ↗
nx run integration-tests:test✅ Succeeded3sView ↗
nx run types:build✅ Succeeded4sView ↗
nx run-many -t lint✅ Succeeded3m 13sView ↗
nx run-many -t typecheck✅ Succeeded2m 3sView ↗
nx run generate-configs✅ Succeeded6sView ↗
nx test typescript-estree --coverage=false✅ Succeeded2sView ↗
nx test eslint-plugin-internal --coverage=false✅ Succeeded5sView ↗
Additional runs (27)✅ Succeeded...View ↗

☁️Nx Cloud last updated this comment at2025-09-08 14:24:04 UTC

@mdm317mdm317 changed the titlefix(eslint-plugin): [prefer-return-this-type] don't report an error when returning a union type that includes a classType.fix(eslint-plugin): [prefer-return-this-type] don't report an error when returning a union type that includes a classTypeJul 29, 2025
@mdm317
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

I think there's an issue with these two CI commands:
nx run ast-spec:test -- --coverage andnx run integration-tests:test

If not, please let me know.

kirkwaiblinger reacted with thumbs up emoji

@mdm317mdm317 marked this pull request as ready for reviewJuly 30, 2025 15:16
@kirkwaiblinger
Copy link
Member

I think there's an issue with these two CI commands:nx run ast-spec:test -- --coverage andnx run integration-tests:test

If not, please let me know.

Yeah, filed#11436,#11437,#11438

mdm317 reacted with heart emoji

@JoshuaKGoldberg
Copy link
Member

main is up-to-date now; merging it in should fix the CI issues. I'll go ahead and do that now.

JoshuaKGoldberg
JoshuaKGoldberg previously approved these changesSep 3, 2025
Copy link
Member

@JoshuaKGoldbergJoshuaKGoldberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

Nice and clean, thank you!

Just one note onhiddens in tests - we can always clean this up before release.

@JoshuaKGoldbergJoshuaKGoldberg added the 1 approval>=1 team member has approved this PR; we're now leaving it open for more reviews before we merge labelSep 3, 2025
@codecovCodecov
Copy link

codecovbot commentedSep 3, 2025
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 90.92%. Comparing base (42cf79e) to head (9a559d3).
⚠️ Report is 11 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@##             main   #11432      +/-   ##==========================================+ Coverage   90.90%   90.92%   +0.01%==========================================  Files         505      505                Lines       51125    51180      +55       Branches     8421     8432      +11     ==========================================+ Hits        46473    46533      +60+ Misses       4639     4634       -5  Partials       13       13
FlagCoverage Δ
unittest90.92% <100.00%> (+0.01%)⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown.Click here to find out more.

Files with missing linesCoverage Δ
...eslint-plugin/src/rules/prefer-return-this-type.ts98.60% <100.00%> (+0.08%)⬆️

... and13 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@JoshuaKGoldbergJoshuaKGoldberg merged commitbd8ed8d intotypescript-eslint:mainSep 8, 2025
62 checks passed
ArnaudBarre added a commit to ArnaudBarre/tsl that referenced this pull requestSep 10, 2025
renovatebot added a commit to andrei-picus-tink/auto-renovate that referenced this pull requestSep 10, 2025
| datasource | package                          | from   | to     || ---------- | -------------------------------- | ------ | ------ || npm        | @typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin | 8.42.0 | 8.43.0 || npm        | @typescript-eslint/parser        | 8.42.0 | 8.43.0 |## [v8.43.0](https://github.com/typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint/blob/HEAD/packages/eslint-plugin/CHANGELOG.md#8430-2025-09-08)##### 🚀 Features- **typescript-estree:** disallow empty type parameter/argument lists ([#11563](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#11563))##### 🩹 Fixes- **eslint-plugin:** \[prefer-return-this-type] don't report an error when returning a union type that includes a classType ([#11432](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#11432))- **eslint-plugin:** \[no-deprecated] should report deprecated exports and reexports ([#11359](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#11359))- **eslint-plugin:** \[no-floating-promises] allowForKnownSafeCalls now supports function names ([#11423](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#11423), [#11430](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#11430))- **eslint-plugin:** \[consistent-type-exports] fix declaration shadowing ([#11457](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#11457))- **eslint-plugin:** \[no-unnecessary-type-conversion] only report \~\~ on integer literal types ([#11517](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#11517))- **scope-manager:** exclude Program from DefinitionBase node types ([#11469](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#11469))- **eslint-plugin:** \[no-non-null-assertion] do not suggest optional chain on LHS of assignment ([#11489](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#11489))- **type-utils:** add union type support to TypeOrValueSpecifier ([#11526](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#11526))##### ❤️ Thank You- Dima [@dbarabashh](https://github.com/dbarabashh)- Kirk Waiblinger [@kirkwaiblinger](https://github.com/kirkwaiblinger)- mdm317- tao- Victor Genaev [@mainframev](https://github.com/mainframev)- Yukihiro Hasegawa [@y-hsgw](https://github.com/y-hsgw)- 민감자(Minji Kim) [@mouse0429](https://github.com/mouse0429)- 송재욱You can read about our [versioning strategy](https://typescript-eslint.io/users/versioning) and [releases](https://typescript-eslint.io/users/releases) on our website.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@JoshuaKGoldbergJoshuaKGoldbergJoshuaKGoldberg left review comments

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
1 approval>=1 team member has approved this PR; we're now leaving it open for more reviews before we merge
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Bug:prefer-return-this-type reports on return type unions containing the class when an actual return value might not bethis
3 participants
@mdm317@kirkwaiblinger@JoshuaKGoldberg

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp