Thanks for the PR,@JounQin!

typescript-eslint is a 100% community driven project, and we are incredibly grateful that you are contributing to that community.

The core maintainers work on this in their personal time, so please understand that it may not be possible for them to review your work immediately.

Thanks again!

🙏Please, if you or your company is finding typescript-eslint valuable, help us sustain the project by sponsoring it transparently onhttps://opencollective.com/typescript-eslint.

✅ Deploy Preview fortypescript-eslint ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	287dd32
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/projects/typescript-eslint/deploys/684c1dc2237d420008faa838
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-11302--typescript-eslint.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.
Lighthouse	1 paths audited Performance: 92 (🔴 down 7 from production) Accessibility: 100 (no change from production) Best Practices: 100 (no change from production) SEO: 98 (no change from production) PWA: 80 (no change from production) View the detailed breakdown and full score reports

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to yourNetlify project configuration.

View yourCI Pipeline Execution ↗ for commit287dd32.

☁️Nx Cloud last updated this comment at2025-06-13 12:51:05 UTC

Hey@JounQin! Switching this to a draft since this isn't ready for review (failing existing tests, lack of added tests). Feel free to undraft when ready!

Btw, in case it's helpful,#10201 likely has important context for when you're working on this (you may already be aware of that)

Btw, in case it's helpful,#10201 likely has important context for when you're working on this (you may already be aware of that)

I didn't know about that PR at all.

@reduckted Do you have any idea here?

I've been working on this too, but I can't seem to come up with a good way to test it.
After initializing the mocking withrestoreAllMocks(), access#lintersByBasePath and test with key. Its key is set to/ if input is absolutePath.
However, structurally, that field is inaccessible.

I've been working on this too

Thanks@nayounsang. Maybe I should just close this PR? I don't have enough bandwidth to investigate deeply. I was thinking it's easy to fix.

Oh, no problem. I'll leave it up to you to decide. It seems simple to fix the problem itself (you've already done a lot of work).
I was just mentioning the difficulty with the test code.
I have free time, so if you have any difficulties, please let me know anytime. I will continue working on it.