Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

chore: upgrade to Docusaurus 3.7#11262

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

benmccann
Copy link
Contributor

@benmccannbenmccann commentedMay 31, 2025
edited
Loading

PR Checklist

Overview

Upgrades to Docusaurus 3.7. It would be nice to upgrade to Docusaurus 3.8, but I can't figure out how to do that with this repo's setup. See here for my attempt at that:#11260

@typescript-eslint
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the PR,@benmccann!

typescript-eslint is a 100% community driven project, and we are incredibly grateful that you are contributing to that community.

The core maintainers work on this in their personal time, so please understand that it may not be possible for them to review your work immediately.

Thanks again!


🙏Please, if you or your company is finding typescript-eslint valuable, help us sustain the project by sponsoring it transparently onhttps://opencollective.com/typescript-eslint.

@netlifyNetlify
Copy link

netlifybot commentedMay 31, 2025
edited
Loading

Deploy Preview fortypescript-eslint ready!

NameLink
🔨 Latest commit1ad48bd
🔍 Latest deploy loghttps://app.netlify.com/projects/typescript-eslint/deploys/683b22f2c741f4000848fe32
😎 Deploy Previewhttps://deploy-preview-11262--typescript-eslint.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.
Lighthouse
Lighthouse
1 paths audited
Performance: 88 (🔴 down 9 from production)
Accessibility: 100 (no change from production)
Best Practices: 100 (no change from production)
SEO: 100 (🟢 up 2 from production)
PWA: 80 (no change from production)
View the detailed breakdown and full score reports

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to yourNetlify project configuration.

@nx-cloudNx Cloud
Copy link

nx-cloudbot commentedMay 31, 2025
edited
Loading

View yourCI Pipeline Execution ↗ for commit1ad48bd.

CommandStatusDurationResult
nx run-many -t typecheck✅ Succeeded2m 5sView ↗
nx run-many -t lint✅ Succeeded10sView ↗
nx test eslint-plugin --coverage=false✅ Succeeded<1sView ↗
nx test typescript-estree --coverage=false✅ Succeeded<1sView ↗
nx test eslint-plugin-internal --coverage=false✅ Succeeded<1sView ↗
nx run types:build✅ Succeeded9sView ↗
nx run integration-tests:test✅ Succeeded<1sView ↗
nx run generate-configs✅ Succeeded10sView ↗
Additional runs (27)✅ Succeeded...View ↗

☁️Nx Cloud last updated this comment at2025-05-31 15:45:26 UTC

@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@
"typescript": "*"
},
"devDependencies": {
"@docusaurus/module-type-aliases": "^3.2.1",
"@docusaurus/module-type-aliases": "~3.7.0",

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

Almost everywhere else uses^. I think the two existing~s might have been unintentional. Is there a reason to go with~ here?

If it doesn't make a strong difference, I'd think we'd rather stick with^ for consistency.

Copy link
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

The reason was because larger changes are needed to adopt 3.8. Ideally we'd just upgrade to 3.8, but I was having trouble with that given that I'm not a React developer. I don't know if those changes would be hard for someone familiar with Docusaurus and React, but they might be a bit beyond me.

kirkwaiblinger reacted with thumbs up emoji

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

Ah gotcha, so this is to make sure we don't accidentally bump to a3.8 of something then? In that case if it makes it easier to not accidentally bump, that seems reasonable to me.

Copy link
Member

@JoshuaKGoldbergJoshuaKGoldberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

🚀 Functionally it all looks good to me. Just checking in on the^/~?

Copy link
Member

@JoshuaKGoldbergJoshuaKGoldberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

(wrong lever)

@JoshuaKGoldbergJoshuaKGoldberg added the awaiting responseIssues waiting for a reply from the OP or another party labelJun 9, 2025
Copy link
Member

@JoshuaKGoldbergJoshuaKGoldberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

👍 assuming we'd switch back to^ once 3.8 happens.

@JoshuaKGoldbergJoshuaKGoldberg added 1 approval>=1 team member has approved this PR; we're now leaving it open for more reviews before we merge and removed awaiting responseIssues waiting for a reply from the OP or another party labelsJun 9, 2025
@benmccann
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

Yes, I was thinking we'd switch back to^ for 3.8. You can see my attempt at it here:#11260. I'm not sure if I should leave it open or not as I'm not sure whether I can complete it, but it should be directionally correct and provide details about what needs to happen if there's someone who either wants to take it over or make their own attempt.

JoshuaKGoldberg reacted with thumbs up emoji

@JoshuaKGoldbergJoshuaKGoldberg merged commit6a7424c intotypescript-eslint:mainJun 16, 2025
70 checks passed
@github-actionsgithub-actionsbot locked asresolvedand limited conversation to collaboratorsJun 24, 2025
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in.
Reviewers

@JoshuaKGoldbergJoshuaKGoldbergJoshuaKGoldberg approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
1 approval>=1 team member has approved this PR; we're now leaving it open for more reviews before we merge
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants
@benmccann@JoshuaKGoldberg

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp