Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

fix(eslint-plugin): [no-array-constructor] remove optional chaining exemption#10963

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account

Conversation

developer-bandi
Copy link
Contributor

PR Checklist

Overview

remove optional chaining logic and change test case

@typescript-eslint
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the PR,@developer-bandi!

typescript-eslint is a 100% community driven project, and we are incredibly grateful that you are contributing to that community.

The core maintainers work on this in their personal time, so please understand that it may not be possible for them to review your work immediately.

Thanks again!


🙏Please, if you or your company is finding typescript-eslint valuable, help us sustain the project by sponsoring it transparently onhttps://opencollective.com/typescript-eslint.

@netlifyNetlify
Copy link

netlifybot commentedMar 17, 2025
edited
Loading

Deploy Preview fortypescript-eslint ready!

NameLink
🔨 Latest commitde18cb9
🔍 Latest deploy loghttps://app.netlify.com/sites/typescript-eslint/deploys/67e55fc685f28d0008ad3d9c
😎 Deploy Previewhttps://deploy-preview-10963--typescript-eslint.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.
Lighthouse
Lighthouse
1 paths audited
Performance: 99 (no change from production)
Accessibility: 100 (no change from production)
Best Practices: 100 (no change from production)
SEO: 98 (no change from production)
PWA: 80 (no change from production)
View the detailed breakdown and full score reports

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to yourNetlify site configuration.

@nx-cloudNx Cloud
Copy link

nx-cloudbot commentedMar 17, 2025
edited
Loading

View yourCI Pipeline Execution ↗ for commitde18cb9.

CommandStatusDurationResult
nx run integration-tests:test❌ Failed2m 21sView ↗
nx test eslint-plugin✅ Succeeded7m 59sView ↗
nx run eslint-plugin:test -- --coverage✅ Succeeded6m 13sView ↗
nx test utils✅ Succeeded23sView ↗
nx run types:build✅ Succeeded<1sView ↗
nx test type-utils✅ Succeeded<1sView ↗
nx run-many --target=build --exclude website --...✅ Succeeded21sView ↗
nx test typescript-estree✅ Succeeded1m 18sView ↗
Additional runs (25)✅ Succeeded...View ↗

☁️Nx Cloud last updated this comment at2025-03-27 15:19:50 UTC

@codecovCodecov
Copy link

codecovbot commentedMar 17, 2025
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 87.97%. Comparing base(543d36c) to head(e8be03c).
Report is 15 commits behind head on main.

Current heade8be03c differs from pull request most recent headde18cb9

Pleaseupload reports for the commitde18cb9 to get more accurate results.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@##             main   #10963      +/-   ##==========================================+ Coverage   87.58%   87.97%   +0.38%==========================================  Files         470      470                Lines       16095    16709     +614       Branches     4668     4711      +43     ==========================================+ Hits        14097    14699     +602- Misses       1642     1664      +22+ Partials      356      346      -10
FlagCoverage Δ
unittest87.97% <100.00%> (+0.38%)⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown.Click here to find out more.

Files with missing linesCoverage Δ
...es/eslint-plugin/src/rules/no-array-constructor.ts100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

... and14 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@JoshuaKGoldbergJoshuaKGoldberg changed the titlefix(eslint-plugin): [no-array-constructor] remove optional chainingfix(eslint-plugin): [no-array-constructor] remove optional chaining exemptionMar 24, 2025
Copy link
Member

@JoshuaKGoldbergJoshuaKGoldberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

Progress 💪

const preambleLength = node.callee.range[1] - node.range[0];
const preambleLength =
node.parent.type === AST_NODE_TYPES.ChainExpression
? node.callee.range[1] + 2 - node.range[0]

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

+ 2

[Testing] 😬 Hardcoded lengths like'?'.length & equivalent are a bit dangerous to rely on. They tend to be broken over time by AST oddities like comments and whitespace. Since this rule logic is newly dependent on character lengths, could you please add some tests to make sure this is working as intended in those edge cases?

Here's a "fun" one:

/* a *//* b */Array/* c *//* d */ ?./* e *//* f */()/* g *//* h */

developer-bandi reacted with thumbs up emoji
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

Added test code by referencing upstream and improved it to avoid hardcoding.

@JoshuaKGoldbergJoshuaKGoldberg added the awaiting responseIssues waiting for a reply from the OP or another party labelMar 24, 2025
@github-actionsgithub-actionsbot removed the awaiting responseIssues waiting for a reply from the OP or another party labelMar 25, 2025
Copy link
Member

@JoshuaKGoldbergJoshuaKGoldberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

LGTM, thanks! 🚀

I'll note that the fixers do drop some comments, but that's an existing issue. Filed:#11013

@JoshuaKGoldbergJoshuaKGoldberg merged commitc548aa7 intotypescript-eslint:mainMar 31, 2025
54 of 55 checks passed
renovatebot added a commit to andrei-picus-tink/auto-renovate that referenced this pull requestApr 1, 2025
| datasource | package                          | from   | to     || ---------- | -------------------------------- | ------ | ------ || npm        | @typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin | 8.27.0 | 8.29.0 || npm        | @typescript-eslint/parser        | 8.27.0 | 8.29.0 |## [v8.29.0](https://github.com/typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint/blob/HEAD/packages/eslint-plugin/CHANGELOG.md#8290-2025-03-31)##### 🚀 Features-   **eslint-plugin:** \[prefer-nullish-coalescing] create `ignoreIfStatements` option ([#11000](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#11000))##### 🩹 Fixes-   **eslint-plugin:** \[no-array-constructor] remove optional chaining exemption ([#10963](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10963))-   **eslint-plugin:** support arbitrary extensions in definition files ([#10957](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10957))-   **eslint-plugin:** \[prefer-for-of] fix false positive when using erasable type syntax within update expressions ([#10981](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10981))-   **eslint-plugin:** \[use-unknown-in-catch-callback-variable] remove fixable property ([#10993](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10993))-   **eslint-plugin:** \[no-unnecessary-condition] don't report on unnecessary optional array index access when `noUncheckedIndexedAccess` is enabled ([#10961](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10961))##### ❤️ Thank You-   Dima Barabash [@dbarabashh](https://github.com/dbarabashh)-   Kim Sang Du [@developer-bandi](https://github.com/developer-bandi)-   Olivier Zalmanski [@OlivierZal](https://github.com/OlivierZal)-   Ronen Amiel-   Yannick Decat [@mho22](https://github.com/mho22)-   zyoshoka [@zyoshoka](https://github.com/zyoshoka)You can read about our [versioning strategy](https://main--typescript-eslint.netlify.app/users/versioning) and [releases](https://main--typescript-eslint.netlify.app/users/releases) on our website.## [v8.28.0](https://github.com/typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint/blob/HEAD/packages/eslint-plugin/CHANGELOG.md#8280-2025-03-24)##### 🚀 Features-   **eslint-plugin:** \[prefer-nullish-coalescing] support `if` statement assignment (`??=`) and fix several minor bugs ([#10861](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10861))##### 🩹 Fixes-   **eslint-plugin:** \[no-unsafe-function-type] remove fixable property ([#10986](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10986))##### ❤️ Thank You-   Olivier Zalmanski [@OlivierZal](https://github.com/OlivierZal)-   Yannick Decat [@mho22](https://github.com/mho22)You can read about our [versioning strategy](https://main--typescript-eslint.netlify.app/users/versioning) and [releases](https://main--typescript-eslint.netlify.app/users/releases) on our website.
renovatebot added a commit to andrei-picus-tink/auto-renovate that referenced this pull requestApr 1, 2025
| datasource | package                          | from   | to     || ---------- | -------------------------------- | ------ | ------ || npm        | @typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin | 8.27.0 | 8.29.0 || npm        | @typescript-eslint/parser        | 8.27.0 | 8.29.0 |## [v8.29.0](https://github.com/typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint/blob/HEAD/packages/eslint-plugin/CHANGELOG.md#8290-2025-03-31)##### 🚀 Features-   **eslint-plugin:** \[prefer-nullish-coalescing] create `ignoreIfStatements` option ([#11000](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#11000))##### 🩹 Fixes-   **eslint-plugin:** \[no-array-constructor] remove optional chaining exemption ([#10963](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10963))-   **eslint-plugin:** support arbitrary extensions in definition files ([#10957](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10957))-   **eslint-plugin:** \[prefer-for-of] fix false positive when using erasable type syntax within update expressions ([#10981](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10981))-   **eslint-plugin:** \[use-unknown-in-catch-callback-variable] remove fixable property ([#10993](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10993))-   **eslint-plugin:** \[no-unnecessary-condition] don't report on unnecessary optional array index access when `noUncheckedIndexedAccess` is enabled ([#10961](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10961))##### ❤️ Thank You-   Dima Barabash [@dbarabashh](https://github.com/dbarabashh)-   Kim Sang Du [@developer-bandi](https://github.com/developer-bandi)-   Olivier Zalmanski [@OlivierZal](https://github.com/OlivierZal)-   Ronen Amiel-   Yannick Decat [@mho22](https://github.com/mho22)-   zyoshoka [@zyoshoka](https://github.com/zyoshoka)You can read about our [versioning strategy](https://main--typescript-eslint.netlify.app/users/versioning) and [releases](https://main--typescript-eslint.netlify.app/users/releases) on our website.## [v8.28.0](https://github.com/typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint/blob/HEAD/packages/eslint-plugin/CHANGELOG.md#8280-2025-03-24)##### 🚀 Features-   **eslint-plugin:** \[prefer-nullish-coalescing] support `if` statement assignment (`??=`) and fix several minor bugs ([#10861](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10861))##### 🩹 Fixes-   **eslint-plugin:** \[no-unsafe-function-type] remove fixable property ([#10986](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10986))##### ❤️ Thank You-   Olivier Zalmanski [@OlivierZal](https://github.com/OlivierZal)-   Yannick Decat [@mho22](https://github.com/mho22)You can read about our [versioning strategy](https://main--typescript-eslint.netlify.app/users/versioning) and [releases](https://main--typescript-eslint.netlify.app/users/releases) on our website.
aryaemami59 pushed a commit to aryaemami59/typescript-eslint that referenced this pull requestApr 5, 2025
…xemption (typescript-eslint#10963)* fix: remove optional chaining* fix: add space, coment add case* fix: testcase error
@github-actionsgithub-actionsbot locked asresolvedand limited conversation to collaboratorsApr 8, 2025
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in.
Reviewers

@JoshuaKGoldbergJoshuaKGoldbergJoshuaKGoldberg approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Bug: [no-array-constructor] Does not detectArray call with optional chaining
2 participants
@developer-bandi@JoshuaKGoldberg

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp