Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

fix(eslint-plugin): [prefer-reduce-type-parameter] don't report cases in which the fix results in a type error#10494

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account

Conversation

ronami
Copy link
Member

@ronamironami commentedDec 13, 2024
edited
Loading

PR Checklist

Overview

This PR tackles#3440 and makes the rule skip cases where the type assertion is necessary and auto-fixing to usingreduce()'s type parameter will result in a type error.

Alternatively, as code that does this isn't exactly safe, the rule can still report such cases but use a suggestion instead of an auto-fix (althoughno-unsafe-type-assertion will report the assertion as unsafe).

darkbasic reacted with thumbs up emojidarkbasic reacted with heart emojidarkbasic and JoshuaKGoldberg reacted with rocket emoji
@typescript-eslint
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the PR,@ronami!

typescript-eslint is a 100% community driven project, and we are incredibly grateful that you are contributing to that community.

The core maintainers work on this in their personal time, so please understand that it may not be possible for them to review your work immediately.

Thanks again!


🙏Please, if you or your company is finding typescript-eslint valuable, help us sustain the project by sponsoring it transparently onhttps://opencollective.com/typescript-eslint.

@netlifyNetlify
Copy link

netlifybot commentedDec 13, 2024
edited
Loading

Deploy Preview fortypescript-eslint ready!

NameLink
🔨 Latest commit906407e
🔍 Latest deploy loghttps://app.netlify.com/sites/typescript-eslint/deploys/675c55d858155b00089667d8
😎 Deploy Previewhttps://deploy-preview-10494--typescript-eslint.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.
Lighthouse
Lighthouse
1 paths audited
Performance: 99 (🟢 up 1 from production)
Accessibility: 100 (no change from production)
Best Practices: 92 (no change from production)
SEO: 98 (no change from production)
PWA: 80 (no change from production)
View the detailed breakdown and full score reports

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to yourNetlify site configuration.

@nx-cloudNx Cloud
Copy link

nx-cloudbot commentedDec 13, 2024
edited
Loading

☁️ Nx Cloud Report

CI is running/has finished running commands for commit906407e. As they complete they will appear below. Click to see the status, the terminal output, and the build insights.

📂 See all runs for this CI Pipeline Execution


✅ Successfully ran 2 targets

Sent with 💌 fromNxCloud.

Comment on lines +83 to +91
function f<T extends Record<string, boolean>>() {
['a', 'b'].reduce(
(accum, name) => ({
...accum,
[name]: true,
}),
{} as T,
);
}
Copy link
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

This was a missing edge case in#10453.

JoshuaKGoldberg reacted with thumbs up emoji
Comment on lines +72 to +78
['a', 'b'].reduce(
(accum, name) => ({
...accum,
[name]: true,
}),
{ a: true, b: false, c: true } as Record<'a' | 'b', boolean>,
);
Copy link
MemberAuthor

@ronamironamiDec 13, 2024
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

I'm not sure if it's necessary to cover this, but it's somewhat ofan edge case with TypeScript's assignability.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

Heh, yeah, I say let's cover it.

ronami reacted with thumbs up emoji
@codecovCodecov
Copy link

codecovbot commentedDec 13, 2024
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 86.78%. Comparing base(a383d50) to head(505f513).

Current head505f513 differs from pull request most recent head906407e

Pleaseupload reports for the commit906407e to get more accurate results.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@##             main   #10494   +/-   ##=======================================  Coverage   86.78%   86.78%           =======================================  Files         445      445             Lines       15356    15363    +7       Branches     4472     4474    +2     =======================================+ Hits        13326    13333    +7  Misses       1675     1675             Partials      355      355
FlagCoverage Δ
unittest86.78% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown.Click here to find out more.

Files with missing linesCoverage Δ
...t-plugin/src/rules/prefer-reduce-type-parameter.ts100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

@ronamironami marked this pull request as ready for reviewDecember 13, 2024 10:01
@ronamironami marked this pull request as draftDecember 13, 2024 10:01
}
`,
`
['a', 'b'].reduce((accum, name) => \`\${accum} | hello \${name}!\`);
Copy link
MemberAuthor

@ronamironamiDec 13, 2024
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

This isn't directly related to the change, but it was previously missing coverage, and because it is on its own line now, it fails codecov.

JoshuaKGoldberg reacted with thumbs up emoji
@ronamironami marked this pull request as ready for reviewDecember 13, 2024 10:29
Copy link
Member

@JoshuaKGoldbergJoshuaKGoldberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

YES FINALLY!!!!

Steve Buscemi in a brown messy wig saying "Whew!" and shaking/vibrating his head

kirkwaiblinger and ronami reacted with laugh emoji
@JoshuaKGoldbergJoshuaKGoldberg added the 1 approval>=1 team member has approved this PR; we're now leaving it open for more reviews before we merge labelDec 14, 2024
@JoshuaKGoldbergJoshuaKGoldberg merged commitba39dde intotypescript-eslint:mainDec 21, 2024
62 checks passed
@ronamironami deleted the prefer-reduce-type-parameter-unfixable-reporting branchDecember 21, 2024 14:09
renovatebot added a commit to andrei-picus-tink/auto-renovate that referenced this pull requestDec 23, 2024
| datasource | package                          | from   | to     || ---------- | -------------------------------- | ------ | ------ || npm        | @typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin | 8.18.1 | 8.18.2 || npm        | @typescript-eslint/parser        | 8.18.1 | 8.18.2 |## [v8.18.2](https://github.com/typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint/blob/HEAD/packages/eslint-plugin/CHANGELOG.md#8182-2024-12-23)##### 🩹 Fixes-   **eslint-plugin:** \[no-unnecessary-condition] handle noUncheckedIndexedAccess true ([#10514](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10514))-   **eslint-plugin:** \[consistent-type-assertions] allow default assertionStyle option ([#10512](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10512))-   **eslint-plugin:** \[no-unnecessary-type-arguments] handle type/value context ([#10503](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10503))-   **eslint-plugin:** \[no-unsafe-type-assertion] fix for unsafe assertion to a constrained type parameter ([#10461](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10461))-   **eslint-plugin:** \[consistent-indexed-object-style] use a suggestion over an auto-fix if can't reliably determine that produced index signature is valid ([#10490](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10490))-   **eslint-plugin:** \[no-unnecessary-condition] don't flag values of an unconstrained or valid type parameter ([#10473](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10473))-   **eslint-plugin:** \[prefer-reduce-type-parameter] don't report cases in which the fix results in a type error ([#10494](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10494))-   **eslint-plugin:** \[no-deprecated] not reporting usages of deprecated declared constants as object value ([#10498](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10498))##### ❤️ Thank You-   Luke Deen Taylor [@controversial](https://github.com/controversial)-   Ronen Amiel-   Scott O'Hara-   YeonJuan [@yeonjuan](https://github.com/yeonjuan)-   Yukihiro Hasegawa [@y-hsgw](https://github.com/y-hsgw)You can read about our [versioning strategy](https://main--typescript-eslint.netlify.app/users/versioning) and [releases](https://main--typescript-eslint.netlify.app/users/releases) on our website.
renovatebot added a commit to mmkal/eslint-plugin-mmkal that referenced this pull requestDec 23, 2024
##### [v8.18.2](https://github.com/typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint/blob/HEAD/packages/eslint-plugin/CHANGELOG.md#8182-2024-12-23)##### 🩹 Fixes-   **eslint-plugin:** \[no-unnecessary-condition] handle noUncheckedIndexedAccess true ([#10514](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10514))-   **eslint-plugin:** \[consistent-type-assertions] allow default assertionStyle option ([#10512](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10512))-   **eslint-plugin:** \[no-unnecessary-type-arguments] handle type/value context ([#10503](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10503))-   **eslint-plugin:** \[no-unsafe-type-assertion] fix for unsafe assertion to a constrained type parameter ([#10461](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10461))-   **eslint-plugin:** \[consistent-indexed-object-style] use a suggestion over an auto-fix if can't reliably determine that produced index signature is valid ([#10490](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10490))-   **eslint-plugin:** \[no-unnecessary-condition] don't flag values of an unconstrained or valid type parameter ([#10473](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10473))-   **eslint-plugin:** \[prefer-reduce-type-parameter] don't report cases in which the fix results in a type error ([#10494](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10494))-   **eslint-plugin:** \[no-deprecated] not reporting usages of deprecated declared constants as object value ([#10498](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10498))##### ❤️ Thank You-   Luke Deen Taylor [@controversial](https://github.com/controversial)-   Ronen Amiel-   Scott O'Hara-   YeonJuan [@yeonjuan](https://github.com/yeonjuan)-   Yukihiro Hasegawa [@y-hsgw](https://github.com/y-hsgw)You can read about our [versioning strategy](https://main--typescript-eslint.netlify.app/users/versioning) and [releases](https://main--typescript-eslint.netlify.app/users/releases) on our website.
@github-actionsgithub-actionsbot locked asresolvedand limited conversation to collaboratorsDec 30, 2024
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in.
Reviewers

@JoshuaKGoldbergJoshuaKGoldbergJoshuaKGoldberg approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
1 approval>=1 team member has approved this PR; we're now leaving it open for more reviews before we merge
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Bug: [prefer-reduce-type-parameter] unfixable reporting
2 participants
@ronami@JoshuaKGoldberg

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp