Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork2.8k
fix(eslint-plugin): [consistent-indexed-object-style] use a suggestion over an auto-fix if can't reliably determine that produced index signature is valid#10490
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Conversation
Thanks for the PR,@ronami! typescript-eslint is a 100% community driven project, and we are incredibly grateful that you are contributing to that community. The core maintainers work on this in their personal time, so please understand that it may not be possible for them to review your work immediately. Thanks again! 🙏Please, if you or your company is finding typescript-eslint valuable, help us sustain the project by sponsoring it transparently onhttps://opencollective.com/typescript-eslint. |
netlifybot commentedDec 12, 2024 • edited
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
edited
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
✅ Deploy Preview fortypescript-eslint ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to yourNetlify site configuration. |
nx-cloudbot commentedDec 12, 2024 • edited
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
edited
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
☁️ Nx Cloud ReportCI is running/has finished running commands for commit023265d. As they complete they will appear below. Click to see the status, the terminal output, and the build insights. 📂 See all runs for this CI Pipeline Execution ✅ Successfully ran 2 targetsSent with 💌 fromNxCloud. |
codecovbot commentedDec 13, 2024 • edited
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
edited
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #10490 +/- ##==========================================+ Coverage 86.78% 86.79% +0.01%========================================== Files 445 445 Lines 15356 15369 +13 Branches 4472 4477 +5 ==========================================+ Hits 13326 13339 +13 Misses 1675 1675 Partials 355 355
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown.Click here to find out more.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
Awesome!
@Josh-Cena I was just thinking about#4730, it keeps coming up. This is great.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
Haven't looked too closely, just dropped one drive-by question. Feel free to merge, no blockers from me
packages/eslint-plugin/src/rules/consistent-indexed-object-style.ts OutdatedShow resolvedHide resolved
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
91e7217
intotypescript-eslint:mainUh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
| datasource | package | from | to || ---------- | -------------------------------- | ------ | ------ || npm | @typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin | 8.18.1 | 8.18.2 || npm | @typescript-eslint/parser | 8.18.1 | 8.18.2 |## [v8.18.2](https://github.com/typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint/blob/HEAD/packages/eslint-plugin/CHANGELOG.md#8182-2024-12-23)##### 🩹 Fixes- **eslint-plugin:** \[no-unnecessary-condition] handle noUncheckedIndexedAccess true ([#10514](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10514))- **eslint-plugin:** \[consistent-type-assertions] allow default assertionStyle option ([#10512](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10512))- **eslint-plugin:** \[no-unnecessary-type-arguments] handle type/value context ([#10503](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10503))- **eslint-plugin:** \[no-unsafe-type-assertion] fix for unsafe assertion to a constrained type parameter ([#10461](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10461))- **eslint-plugin:** \[consistent-indexed-object-style] use a suggestion over an auto-fix if can't reliably determine that produced index signature is valid ([#10490](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10490))- **eslint-plugin:** \[no-unnecessary-condition] don't flag values of an unconstrained or valid type parameter ([#10473](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10473))- **eslint-plugin:** \[prefer-reduce-type-parameter] don't report cases in which the fix results in a type error ([#10494](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10494))- **eslint-plugin:** \[no-deprecated] not reporting usages of deprecated declared constants as object value ([#10498](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10498))##### ❤️ Thank You- Luke Deen Taylor [@controversial](https://github.com/controversial)- Ronen Amiel- Scott O'Hara- YeonJuan [@yeonjuan](https://github.com/yeonjuan)- Yukihiro Hasegawa [@y-hsgw](https://github.com/y-hsgw)You can read about our [versioning strategy](https://main--typescript-eslint.netlify.app/users/versioning) and [releases](https://main--typescript-eslint.netlify.app/users/releases) on our website.
##### [v8.18.2](https://github.com/typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint/blob/HEAD/packages/eslint-plugin/CHANGELOG.md#8182-2024-12-23)##### 🩹 Fixes- **eslint-plugin:** \[no-unnecessary-condition] handle noUncheckedIndexedAccess true ([#10514](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10514))- **eslint-plugin:** \[consistent-type-assertions] allow default assertionStyle option ([#10512](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10512))- **eslint-plugin:** \[no-unnecessary-type-arguments] handle type/value context ([#10503](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10503))- **eslint-plugin:** \[no-unsafe-type-assertion] fix for unsafe assertion to a constrained type parameter ([#10461](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10461))- **eslint-plugin:** \[consistent-indexed-object-style] use a suggestion over an auto-fix if can't reliably determine that produced index signature is valid ([#10490](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10490))- **eslint-plugin:** \[no-unnecessary-condition] don't flag values of an unconstrained or valid type parameter ([#10473](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10473))- **eslint-plugin:** \[prefer-reduce-type-parameter] don't report cases in which the fix results in a type error ([#10494](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10494))- **eslint-plugin:** \[no-deprecated] not reporting usages of deprecated declared constants as object value ([#10498](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10498))##### ❤️ Thank You- Luke Deen Taylor [@controversial](https://github.com/controversial)- Ronen Amiel- Scott O'Hara- YeonJuan [@yeonjuan](https://github.com/yeonjuan)- Yukihiro Hasegawa [@y-hsgw](https://github.com/y-hsgw)You can read about our [versioning strategy](https://main--typescript-eslint.netlify.app/users/versioning) and [releases](https://main--typescript-eslint.netlify.app/users/releases) on our website.
PR Checklist
Overview
This PR addresses#4730 and adjusts the rule so it uses a suggestion instead of an auto-fix if the change may create an invalid index signature.
Some thoughts:
Even if the rule uses a suggestion, it can still flag records that can't be fixed to a valid index signature. Developers may need to add
eslint-disable
comments for these these. As long as the ruleisn't type aware, I think that's the best alternative.