Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

fix(eslint-plugin): [no-unnecessary-boolean-literal-compare] flag values of a type parameter with boolean type constraints#10474

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account

Conversation

ronami
Copy link
Member

@ronamironami commentedDec 7, 2024
edited
Loading

PR Checklist

Overview

This PR follows-up#10443 and reports on values with a boolean type parameter that are being compared to a boolean literal:

// failsconsttest1:(someCondition:boolean)=>void=someCondition=>{if(someCondition===true){}};// should failconsttest2:<Textendsboolean>(someCondition:T)=>void=someCondition=>{if(someCondition===true){}};

@typescript-eslint
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the PR,@ronami!

typescript-eslint is a 100% community driven project, and we are incredibly grateful that you are contributing to that community.

The core maintainers work on this in their personal time, so please understand that it may not be possible for them to review your work immediately.

Thanks again!


🙏Please, if you or your company is finding typescript-eslint valuable, help us sustain the project by sponsoring it transparently onhttps://opencollective.com/typescript-eslint.

@netlifyNetlify
Copy link

netlifybot commentedDec 7, 2024
edited
Loading

Deploy Preview fortypescript-eslint ready!

NameLink
🔨 Latest commit60e677a
🔍 Latest deploy loghttps://app.netlify.com/sites/typescript-eslint/deploys/675d3a5e7ce21a00086d0aa8
😎 Deploy Previewhttps://deploy-preview-10474--typescript-eslint.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.
Lighthouse
Lighthouse
1 paths audited
Performance: 99 (🟢 up 1 from production)
Accessibility: 100 (no change from production)
Best Practices: 92 (no change from production)
SEO: 98 (no change from production)
PWA: 80 (no change from production)
View the detailed breakdown and full score reports

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to yourNetlify site configuration.

@nx-cloudNx Cloud
Copy link

nx-cloudbot commentedDec 7, 2024
edited
Loading

☁️ Nx Cloud Report

CI is running/has finished running commands for commit60e677a. As they complete they will appear below. Click to see the status, the terminal output, and the build insights.

📂 See all runs for this CI Pipeline Execution


✅ Successfully ran 32 targets

Sent with 💌 fromNxCloud.

@codecovCodecov
Copy link

codecovbot commentedDec 7, 2024
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 86.78%. Comparing base(cb0ef9c) to head(60e677a).
Report is 8 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@##             main   #10474   +/-   ##=======================================  Coverage   86.77%   86.78%           =======================================  Files         444      445    +1       Lines       15335    15356   +21       Branches     4468     4472    +4     =======================================+ Hits        13307    13326   +19- Misses       1673     1675    +2  Partials      355      355
FlagCoverage Δ
unittest86.78% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown.Click here to find out more.

Files with missing linesCoverage Δ
...rc/rules/no-unnecessary-boolean-literal-compare.ts97.46% <100.00%> (ø)

... and12 files with indirect coverage changes

@ronamironami marked this pull request as ready for reviewDecember 7, 2024 19:34
Copy link
Member

@JoshuaKGoldbergJoshuaKGoldberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

100 emoji with the two red lines animated to draw in

ronami reacted with heart emoji
@JoshuaKGoldbergJoshuaKGoldberg merged commiteaae68c intotypescript-eslint:mainDec 14, 2024
62 checks passed
@ronamironami deleted the no-unnecessary-boolean-literal-compare-report-constrained-type-parameters branchDecember 14, 2024 20:14
renovatebot added a commit to mmkal/eslint-plugin-mmkal that referenced this pull requestDec 16, 2024
##### [v8.18.1](https://github.com/typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint/blob/HEAD/packages/eslint-plugin/CHANGELOG.md#8181-2024-12-16)##### 🩹 Fixes-   **scope-manager:** visit params decorator before nest scope ([#10475](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10475))-   **eslint-plugin:** \[no-unnecessary-condition] better message when comparing between literal types ([#10454](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10454))-   **eslint-plugin:** use consistent naming for asserting types and casting values ([#10472](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10472))-   **eslint-plugin:** \[no-unnecessary-boolean-literal-compare] flag values of a type parameter with boolean type constraints ([#10474](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10474))-   **eslint-plugin:** handle string like index type ([#10460](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10460))-   **eslint-plugin:** \[no-unnecessary-template-expression] don't report when an expression includes comment ([#10444](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10444))##### ❤️ Thank You-   Kirk Waiblinger [@kirkwaiblinger](https://github.com/kirkwaiblinger)-   Ronen Amiel-   YeonJuan [@yeonjuan](https://github.com/yeonjuan)You can read about our [versioning strategy](https://main--typescript-eslint.netlify.app/users/versioning) and [releases](https://main--typescript-eslint.netlify.app/users/releases) on our website.
renovatebot added a commit to andrei-picus-tink/auto-renovate that referenced this pull requestDec 16, 2024
| datasource | package                          | from   | to     || ---------- | -------------------------------- | ------ | ------ || npm        | @typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin | 8.18.0 | 8.18.1 || npm        | @typescript-eslint/parser        | 8.18.0 | 8.18.1 |## [v8.18.1](https://github.com/typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint/blob/HEAD/packages/eslint-plugin/CHANGELOG.md#8181-2024-12-16)##### 🩹 Fixes-   **scope-manager:** visit params decorator before nest scope ([#10475](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10475))-   **eslint-plugin:** \[no-unnecessary-condition] better message when comparing between literal types ([#10454](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10454))-   **eslint-plugin:** use consistent naming for asserting types and casting values ([#10472](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10472))-   **eslint-plugin:** \[no-unnecessary-boolean-literal-compare] flag values of a type parameter with boolean type constraints ([#10474](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10474))-   **eslint-plugin:** handle string like index type ([#10460](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10460))-   **eslint-plugin:** \[no-unnecessary-template-expression] don't report when an expression includes comment ([#10444](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10444))##### ❤️ Thank You-   Kirk Waiblinger [@kirkwaiblinger](https://github.com/kirkwaiblinger)-   Ronen Amiel-   YeonJuan [@yeonjuan](https://github.com/yeonjuan)You can read about our [versioning strategy](https://main--typescript-eslint.netlify.app/users/versioning) and [releases](https://main--typescript-eslint.netlify.app/users/releases) on our website.
@github-actionsgithub-actionsbot locked asresolvedand limited conversation to collaboratorsDec 22, 2024
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in.
Reviewers

@JoshuaKGoldbergJoshuaKGoldbergJoshuaKGoldberg approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Bug: [no-unnecessary-boolean-literal-compare] doesn't flag values of a type parameter with boolean type constraint
2 participants
@ronami@JoshuaKGoldberg

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp