Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork2.8k
Closed
Description
This propsal is a continuation of the discussion in#4061, cc@bradzacher
The ruleprefer-readonly-parameter-types
is known to not play nicely with certain types, with the canonical example being theHTMLElement
from the standard lib. This type cannot be made deep-readonly, as that breaks TS compilation altogether.
Outstanding questions
- Should only the types themselves be ignored, or should the check ignore them, even if they are part of a more complex type?