Before You File a Proposal Please Confirm You Have Done The Following...

• I havesearched for related issues and found none that match my proposal.
• I have searched thecurrent rule list and found no rules that match my proposal.
• I haveread the FAQ and my problem is not listed.

My proposal is suitable for this project

• My proposal specifically checks TypeScript syntax, or it proposes a check that requires type information to be accurate.
• My proposal is not a "formatting rule"; meaning it does not just enforce how code is formatted (whitespace, brace placement, etc).
• I believe my proposal would be useful to the broader TypeScript community (meaning it is not a niche proposal).

Description

Similar torestrict-template-expressions, the new rulerestrict-constructor-expressions restrict the types of expressions passed to constructors such asNumber() andString() to a subset which result in non-surprising return values

TypeScript types for constructors have a permissiveany type for the parameters:

Fail Cases

Number({stdout:'123'})// NaNNumber(['2'])// 2String({result:123})// '[object Object]'// I'm guessing there are many more...

Pass Cases

Number({stdout:'123'}.stdout)// 123Number(['2'][0])// 2String({result:123}.result)// '123'

Additional Info

No response