Movatterモバイル変換

[0]ホーム
URL:

Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

 Sign up
Appearance settings

Simplify ScrollSpy config#33250

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account

Merged
XhmikosR merged 4 commits intotwbs:mainfromGeoSot:simplify-scrollspy-config
Apr 6, 2021
Merged

Conversation

GeoSot
Copy link
Member

@GeoSotGeoSot commentedMar 3, 2021•
edited
Loading

I tried to extract abasicJQueryInterface to be used by other components too

@GeoSotGeoSot requested a review froma team as acode ownerMarch 3, 2021 00:34
@GeoSot
Copy link
MemberAuthor

@rohit2sharma95 ,@XhmikosR
any thoughts on this?

@rohit2sharma95
Copy link
Contributor

Your idea is to move thejQueryInterface's code to utils? There are few plugins that use their own interface withinjQueryInterface 🤔

staticjQueryInterface(config){
returnthis.each(function(){
Carousel.carouselInterface(this,config)
})
}

There is also a functiondefineJQueryPlugin in the utils (if it can be extended instead of writing a new function):

constdefineJQueryPlugin=(name,plugin)=>{
onDOMContentLoaded(()=>{

@XhmikosR
Copy link
Member

Yeah, I'm not sure about this either. We shouldn't overdo it with unnecessary abstractions. So what's the plan here exactly?

@GeoSot
Copy link
MemberAuthor

I saw that most of them use the same functionality. So I think it could be moved as a separate function outside the component. At least for the 6 of them for the beginning. Small size improvements as keeping one pattern. (now all have different pattern of usage)

@XhmikosR
Copy link
Member

Please finish with your suggestion so that we can see if it's worth doing it :)

GeoSot reacted with thumbs up emoji

@GeoSot
Copy link
MemberAuthor

I could start standardizing a bit the configs and the interfaces, and maybe then we can discus the 'one same function'. Does this sound better?

@GeoSotGeoSot requested a review froma team as acode ownerMarch 9, 2021 08:56
@GeoSotGeoSotforce-pushed thesimplify-scrollspy-config branch from5df840b tod4a64b3CompareMarch 9, 2021 17:59
@XhmikosRXhmikosRforce-pushed thesimplify-scrollspy-config branch fromd4a64b3 toe149302CompareMarch 10, 2021 13:21
@GeoSotGeoSotforce-pushed thesimplify-scrollspy-config branch frome149302 toee9baa0CompareMarch 16, 2021 21:53
@GeoSotGeoSotforce-pushed thesimplify-scrollspy-config branch fromee9baa0 to0cc0109CompareMarch 23, 2021 23:39
@GeoSotGeoSotforce-pushed thesimplify-scrollspy-config branch from0cc0109 tobc6dfdfCompareApril 5, 2021 19:43
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@XhmikosRXhmikosRXhmikosR approved these changes

+1 more reviewer

@rohit2sharma95rohit2sharma95rohit2sharma95 approved these changes

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

No one assigned

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@GeoSot@rohit2sharma95@XhmikosR
[8]ページ先頭
©2009-2025 Movatter.jp