Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

fix(tmq): race condition in tmq snapshot for data transformation#33691

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account

Open
wangmm0220 wants to merge2 commits intomain
base:main
Choose a base branch
Loading
fromfix/TD-37606

Conversation

@wangmm0220
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Please briefly describe the code changes in this pull request.

Jira:https://jira.taosdata.com:18080/browse/TD-

Checklist

Please check the items in the checklist if applicable.

  • Is the user manual updated?
  • Are the test cases passed and automated?
  • Is there no significant decrease in test coverage?

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello@wangmm0220, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses a critical race condition within the TMQ snapshot mechanism during data transformation. The changes primarily focus on enhancing thread safety by introducing metadata read locks, standardizing error handling with robust resource cleanup, and removing a function (tqReaderSetVtableInfo) that was likely contributing to the instability or was no longer required in the new, more robust design. These modifications aim to improve the reliability and stability of TMQ snapshot operations.

Highlights

  • Race Condition Fix: Implemented read locks (metaRLock/metaULock) for metadata operations during TMQ snapshot creation and retrieval to prevent race conditions, ensuring data consistency in concurrent environments.
  • Enhanced Error Handling and Resource Management: Standardized error checking and resource cleanup across several functions usingTSDB_CHECK_NULL,TSDB_CHECK_CODE, andTSDB_CHECK_CONDITION macros, coupled withgoto END blocks. This ensures consistent resource deallocation (e.g.,tDecoderClear,tdbTbcClose,taosArrayDestroy) on all execution paths, improving robustness and preventing memory leaks.
  • Removed Obsolete Virtual Table Functionality: Eliminated thetqReaderSetVtableInfo function, its declaration, and its function pointer from theSStoreTqReader struct, along with thecreateStreamVtableBlock function. This streamlines the TMQ snapshot process by removing a component that was likely either problematic or no longer necessary.
  • Clarified Resource Ownership: Explicitly transferred ownership of the snapshot context (sContext) increateTmqRawScanOperatorInfo by setting the original handle's context toNULL, preventing potential double-free or use-after-free issues.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on ourdocumentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either/gemini <command> or@gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

FeatureCommandDescription
Code Review/gemini reviewPerforms a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary/gemini summaryProvides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment@gemini-code-assistResponds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help/gemini helpDisplays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a.gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be foundhere.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on@gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign uphere.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with theGemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review thePrivacy Notices,Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy,Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHubhere. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it anduse code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assistgemini-code-assistbot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request primarily addresses a race condition in the TMQ snapshot functionality by introducing locking around the creation and use of the snapshot context. The changes also include significant refactoring to standardize error handling with macros, which improves code consistency and readability. Additionally, there's some good code cleanup, such as removing an unused function and clarifying resource ownership transfer. My review includes a couple of points: one regarding a non-portable header include that should be changed, and a more critical issue about a potential memory leak caused by a variable being re-declared in a loop. Overall, the core logic for the race condition fix appears sound.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@guanshengliangguanshengliangAwaiting requested review from guanshengliangguanshengliang is a code owner

@hzchenghzchengAwaiting requested review from hzchenghzcheng is a code owner

@dapan1121dapan1121Awaiting requested review from dapan1121dapan1121 is a code owner

1 more reviewer

@gemini-code-assistgemini-code-assist[bot]gemini-code-assist[bot] left review comments

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.

Assignees

No one assigned

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@wangmm0220

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp