Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

Cleanup security voters cookbook recipes#5453

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account

Merged
weaverryan merged 3 commits intosymfony:2.3fromwouterj:issue_5084
Jul 16, 2015

Conversation

@wouterj
Copy link
Member

QA
Doc fix?yes
New docs?no
Applies toall
Fixed tickets#5084

Blacklisting using voters isn't a good practice and in fact, the article (cookbook/security/voters) was almost completely equal to the much newer voter article (cookbook/security/voters_data_permission). I've moved the only different piece (access decision strategy) to the newer voter article and then removed the old voter article.

As the old voter article had a much nicer URL than the new one, I then renamed the new article to have the better name and set up a redirection. Aquick search on Google revealed that there are almost no links to the old article talking about blacklisting specifically, just about voters. So I think we're good here.

The diff is horrible, that's why I've tried to create multiple commits (this will ease reviewing process). The only commit requiring review is9c169c7 (as the other 2 are just moving and removing stuff).

@wouterjwouterjforce-pushed theissue_5084 branch 2 times, most recently from0c9c0f9 tod6fb58aCompareJune 27, 2015 19:55
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

missing closing angle bracket

Copy link
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

fixed

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

[...] to use business logic [...] looks very generic to me. I'd like something like:... apply your own business logic ...,... define the custom logic applied to ..., etc.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

👍

@weaverryanweaverryan merged commit93484a7 intosymfony:2.3Jul 16, 2015
weaverryan added a commit that referenced this pull requestJul 16, 2015
This PR was merged into the 2.3 branch.Discussion----------Cleanup security voters cookbook recipes| Q | A| --- | ---| Doc fix? | yes| New docs? | no| Applies to | all| Fixed tickets |#5084Blacklisting using voters isn't a good practice and in fact, the article (`cookbook/security/voters`) was almost completely equal to the much newer voter article (`cookbook/security/voters_data_permission`). I've moved the only different piece (access decision strategy) to the newer voter article and then removed the old voter article.As the old voter article had a much nicer URL than the new one, I then renamed the new article to have the better name and set up a redirection. A [quick search on Google](https://www.google.nl/search?q=%5Blink%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fsymfony.com%2Fdoc%2Fcurrent%2Fcookbook%2Fsecurity%2Fvoters.html%5D+-site%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fsymfony.com) revealed that there are almost no links to the old article talking about blacklisting specifically, just about voters. So I think we're good here.The diff is horrible, that's why I've tried to create multiple commits (this will ease reviewing process). The only commit requiring review is9c169c7 (as the other 2 are just moving and removing stuff).Commits-------93484a7 Remove the old voter article9c169c7 Rewrite new sectionacf66f9 Move access decision strategy section
@weaverryan
Copy link
Member

@wouterj Really good idea moving things around, etc - I like it a lot. I've merged this in and all the way up with minor tweaks at sha:d4afd3a thanks to some suggestions.

Thanks!

weaverryan added a commit that referenced this pull requestJul 16, 2015
* 2.3:  [#5453] Minor tweaks - mostly thanks to Javier
weaverryan added a commit that referenced this pull requestJul 16, 2015
* 2.6:  [#5472] Minor tweak and adding code example  [#5453] Minor tweaks - mostly thanks to Javier  Reword  Fix caching  Fix build  Added a tip about hashing the result of nextBytes()  rework the quick tour's big picture  fix for Symfony 2.7  Fix after install URL and new photo since AcmeDemoBundle is not part of 2.7  Improve travis build speed
weaverryan added a commit that referenced this pull requestJul 16, 2015
* 2.7:  [#5472] Minor tweak and adding code example  [#5453] Minor tweaks - mostly thanks to Javier  Reword  Fix caching  Fix build  Added a tip about hashing the result of nextBytes()  rework the quick tour's big picture  fix for Symfony 2.7  Fix after install URL and new photo since AcmeDemoBundle is not part of 2.7  Improve travis build speed
weaverryan added a commit that referenced this pull requestJul 16, 2015
* 2.8:  [#5472] Minor tweak and adding code example  [#5453] Minor tweaks - mostly thanks to Javier  Reword  Fix moving the mapped down as per@xabbuh  Fix caching  Fix build  Fix the rendering issue  Fix issues reported by@snoek09 . Thank you.  Added a tip about hashing the result of nextBytes()  Make the necessary changes mentioned by@xabbuh and add example for form  rework the quick tour's big picture  fix for Symfony 2.7  Fix after install URL and new photo since AcmeDemoBundle is not part of 2.7  Starting with range documentation  Improve travis build speed
@wouterjwouterj deleted the issue_5084 branchJuly 16, 2015 07:47
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@wouterj@weaverryan@javiereguiluz@dupuchba@xabbuh

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp