Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

Update routing.rst#3263

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account

Closed
fatmuemoo wants to merge1 commit intosymfony:masterfromfatmuemoo:patch-2
Closed

Conversation

@fatmuemoo
Copy link
Contributor

Added a note to provide extra guidance when naming routes

Added a note to provide extra guidance when naming routes
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

it's not meaningless, you use it to reference to the route (for instance when generating a route in a template or controller)

Copy link
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

I concur. "Meaningless" is the wrong word. "Arbitrary" would be a better way of describing the route name.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

I think we should move this to the last sentence of the next paragraph - so right afterin your controller (keep reading). - how about:

Theblog_show is the internal name of the route, which just doesn't have any meaning yet and just needs to be unique. Later, you'll use it to generate URLs.

I think if we do this (feel free to re-word), then we're in good shape!

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

We should at least avoid the first person perspective.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

Thanks - updated my example above!

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

@fatmuemoo What do you think about my proposed change above? Can you update your PR? If not, just let me know and someone else can open a new PR with the tweak.

Cheers!

Copy link
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

Sounds good to me, thanks

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

@fatmuemoo :) - ok - but can you also update your pull request with the suggested changes? I can also update it for you if you'd like!

Cheers!

@wouterj
Copy link
Member

Replaced by#3857

weaverryan added a commit that referenced this pull requestMay 27, 2014
This PR was merged into the 2.3 branch.Discussion----------Added little bit information about the route nameThis PR replaces#3263| Q   | A| --- | ---| Doc fix? | no| New docs? | yes| Applies to | all| Fixed tickets | -Commits-------90e654b Applied comments66d60d2 Update routing.rst
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@fatmuemoo@wouterj@weaverryan@xabbuh

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp