Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork5.2k
Some version fixes for 2.2#2692
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Conversation
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ Below is the schedule for the first few versions that use this release model: | |||
This results in very predictable dates and maintenance periods. | |||
* *(special)* Symfony 2.2will be released at the end of February 2013; | |||
* *(special)* Symfony 2.2was released at the end of February 2013; | |||
* *(special)* Symfony 2.3 (the first LTS) will be released at the end of May |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
2.3
is also released, should be reflected here, I guess
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
No, that should be reflected on the 2.3 branch (did that in#2690 )
@wouterj - can we do anything with this PR? Some of these changes were made in#2690 and there are problems with some others. Specifically, for the URL changes, we just can't do this (https://github.com/symfony/symfony-docs/pull/2692/files#pullrequestreviewcomment-4954866). If we change the 2.2 URLs all to 2.2, then when we merge to 2.3, we'll need to then re-fix all of the URLs to be 2.3 there. Then again when we merge to master :). Of course, when 2.4 is made into a branch, we'll change all of its URLs to be 2.4, but when we merge back up to master, we'll once again have a mess. I think the only solution is to properly fix this with a Sphinx extension, which shouldn't be too hard, we just need to do it :). So, can we close this PR? |
@weaverryan instead of creating a sphinx extension, we can use the build-in @fabpot is the version option changed when rendering the versions? In other words, are we able to use |
@wouterj I thought the same thing, but I don't think it's possible. If you put
If you can find a way around this, let me know! |