Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork5.3k
Fix for #2485#2681
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
Fix for #2485#2681
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Conversation
| ------------- | ---| Doc fix? | yes| New docs? | no| Applies to | 2.1+| Fixed tickets | 2485Fixes the documented example of how to test forms with custom types,as there was no better suggestions than the one put forward by@chrisburgess7 I implemented that in my test case & it worked soI've updated the documentation to match.
weaverryan commentedJun 30, 2013
Hi Stuart! Thanks for taking on this fix! What do you think about this approach instead:#2485 (comment). It seems truer to the intention of the change (e.g. Thanks! |
weaverryan commentedJun 30, 2013
Hey Stuart! Someone has already fixed this with an approach similar to the one I just pointed out (#2725). I look forward to seeing other contributions from you soon! ;) Thanks! |
Fixes the documented example of how to test forms with custom types,
as there was no better suggestions than the one put forward by
@chrisburgess7 I implemented that in my test case & it worked so
I've updated the documentation to match.
(Resubmitted against the proper branch)