Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork5.3k
Improved and standardized the explanation about priorities#10663
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Conversation
reference/dic_tags.rst Outdated
| The ``priority``valueis optional anddefaults to ``0``. | ||
| The higher priority loaders are tried first. | ||
| The ``priority`` is optional andits value is a positive or negative integer | ||
| that defaults to ``0``. Higher numbers mean that loaders are tried first. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
"Higher numbers mean that loaders are tried first" reads a little awkwardly to me. "Loaders with higher numbers are tried first." is simpler imo.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
Thanks for reviewing this. I made the change you proposed. Thanks!
This is a continuation of#10655.