Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

[Brevo Mailer] Webhook IP Addresses have changed#61062

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account

Merged
fabpot merged 1 commit intosymfony:6.4fromrichardhj:patch-2
Jul 8, 2025

Conversation

@richardhj
Copy link
Contributor

@richardhjrichardhj commentedJul 7, 2025
edited
Loading

QA
Branch?6.4
Bug fix?yes
New feature?no
Deprecations?no
Issues
LicenseMIT

So first I recognized multipleRejectWebhookExceptions. Then I checked my access logs and realized that webhook from Brevo can also come from the '172.246.240.1/20' IP range.

This is also documented here:https://help.brevo.com/hc/en-us/articles/15127404548498-Brevo-IP-ranges-List-of-publicly-exposed-services

This new IP range must have been added later this year, it hasn't been there in January, for instance:https://web.archive.org/web/20250125161029/https://help.brevo.com/hc/en-us/articles/15127404548498-Brevo-IP-ranges-List-of-publicly-exposed-services

So this PR adds the new IP range for ingress webhook validation.

@carsonbot
Copy link

Hey!

Thanks for your PR. You are targeting branch "6.4" but it seems your PR description refers to branch "6.4 for bug fix".
Could you update the PR description or change target branch? This helps core maintainers a lot.

Cheers!

Carsonbot

@fabpot
Copy link
Member

Thank you@richardhj.

@fabpotfabpot merged commit1299446 intosymfony:6.4Jul 8, 2025
11 checks passed
// https://developers.brevo.com/docs/how-to-use-webhooks#securing-your-webhooks
// localhost is added for testing
newIpsRequestMatcher(['185.107.232.1/24','1.179.112.1/20','127.0.0.1']),
newIpsRequestMatcher(['185.107.232.1/24','1.179.112.1/20','172.246.240.1/20','127.0.0.1']),
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

Is the185.107.232.1/24 range still valid? I cannot find it in the linked document.

Copy link
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

You might be right and we can remove the first one. But I thought they might have legacy services running, so this was the most cautious approach.

Copy link
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

At least in my environment I don't find 185.107.xxx requests

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

They did change the IP ranges in their documentation again which is at the time i write this message : 1.179.112.0/20 and 172.246.240.0/20

I did a PR for that#61223

Source :https://help.brevo.com/hc/en-us/articles/15127404548498-Brevo-IP-ranges-List-of-publicly-exposed-services

@kevinpapst
Copy link

Thanks@richardhj , started seeing a few requests from this new IP range this week.

Brevo should do better with communication, this change was not announced nor mailed to users.

simondaigre reacted with thumbs up emoji

This was referencedJul 31, 2025
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@xabbuhxabbuhxabbuh left review comments

@fabpotfabpotfabpot approved these changes

+1 more reviewer

@jarbeyjarbeyjarbey left review comments

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

No one assigned

Projects

None yet

Milestone

6.4

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@richardhj@carsonbot@fabpot@kevinpapst@xabbuh@jarbey

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp