Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork9.7k
[Serializer] Support canners in object normalizer#45282
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Conversation
carsonbot commentedFeb 3, 2022
Hey! I think@mtarld has recently worked with this code. Maybe they can help review this? Cheers! Carsonbot |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
84271d9 to957de4bCompare957de4b to60ee9edComparecfdafae tob88d43cCompare61d2e0b to02d6105Compare02d6105 tod1f643dCompared1f643d to18bc5e3Compare18bc5e3 toc3cb4f5Comparermikalkenas commentedApr 27, 2022
It's been hanging for a while, is there any issues with this PR? |
chalasr left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
LGTM for 6.1
fabpot commentedApr 27, 2022
Thank you@rmikalkenas. |
Noticed that serializer is not capable of normalizing properties with methods that start with
canprefix, even though property info component has support for it. I think it's inconsistent and serializer should support it as well.Targeting 6.1 branch as this sounds like a new feature (correct me if wrong). Also not sure about BC as this change might break others code (until this change, properties with can methods were silently skipped from normalization)