Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork9.7k
[Process] Dont test TTY if there is no TTY support#38950
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Conversation
Nyholm commentedNov 1, 2020
| Q | A |
|---|---|
| Branch? | 4.4 |
| Bug fix? | no |
| New feature? | no |
| Deprecations? | no |
| Tickets | Fix#38946 |
| License | MIT |
| Doc PR |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
derrabus commentedNov 1, 2020
Well, this would make our tests pass. But my understanding is that the TTY detection that you use to skip the test is part of what we want to test here. Let's say we would break that detection logic. We would never know because the corresponding tests would flip from green to skipped. 😕 |
Nyholm commentedNov 1, 2020
Is it testing Isn't it testing that the |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Nyholm commentedNov 2, 2020
PR updated. Thank you |
derrabus commentedNov 2, 2020
@Nyholm If I change |
Nyholm commentedNov 2, 2020
If If What alternative strategy do you have to solve#38946? |
derrabus commentedNov 2, 2020
None. 😕 |
nicolas-grekas commentedNov 2, 2020
Thank you@Nyholm. |