Rather than maintaining a stack of current document (which is not properly maintained in case of errors btw, as the unstacking should be done in afinally block), a better solution could be to avoid the need for the state at all, by removing$this->dom. Instead, the\DOMDocument could be passed as argument to private methods needing it (and a bunch of the existing private methods might use$node->ownerDocument instead of$this->dom to avoid the need to add an argument in their signature).

@stof I have tested the ownerDocument method. It seems to be a working solution and the tests are running but. At the appendNode method the $parentNode argument can be DomDocument so the onwerDocument is null:
connorhu@a6f0be3#diff-b031dbb2186367839adfe20696612866da91513dd315f00ad6df23b5d38fca74L467-R452

@connorhu if the parentNode is already a DomDocument, you already have the DomDocument. That's fine to me.

If we want to make the encoder re-entrant, I think the state in$this->context is also an issue, not only$this->dom

I rebased the PR for branch 3.4 but there are some failure to fix, could you please have a look?

@nicolas-grekas Of course! Thank you!

I think my original bug is now fixed. The current version of XmlEncoder in symfony 3.4 is not so complex. I don't see how can cause the context property a bug like the dom did.

@connorhu the issue is exactly the same that with$this->dom actually: if you call the serializer again during serialization, sotring the call-specific state in the instance will break as the encoder won't be re-entrant (it handles only one state at a time), and it might end up using the wrong state.
The reason you don't see an issue in your reproducing code is because you use an empty context for both calls, so using the wrong empty context is not an issue.

@stof I see the possibility of the context bug, but If you use nothing from context after initialization it can't cause a bug. Safer to remove context property instead of making a note for the future code changes.

@connorhu the thing is, the XmlEncoderis using the context in some of the private methods.

@stof Should I merge the context property remove patch into in this PR? The referred bug only describes the bug about the dom property.

Thank you@connorhu.