Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork9.7k
[Workflow] Added parameter type hinting where possible.#35434
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
i thought we did do return types automatically ...#33236 or why did we miss those initially?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
lyrixx commentedJan 22, 2020 • edited
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
edited
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
I don't think so. Thanks@fre5h for your PR but Most of your change break the BC promise refs: |
lyrixx commentedJan 22, 2020
About the I'm sorry, But I'm gonna close your PR because It cannot be merged. |
ro0NL commentedJan 22, 2020
@lyrixx so we missed those because they break BC :) i see. |
According to#32223 were added type hintings in most classes, but not in all possible. I tried to add more type hintings. Most of my changes look reasonable, but I am not sure in every.
If you find, that in some class/method type hintings are not welcome, then notice it and I will remove it.
If you find, that all my changes are senseless, then just close this pull request :)