Replying to#35047 (comment):

My experience is only with Postmark but I was able to find a similar concept for these 3rd party providers:

Postmark
Tag: single value
Metadata: key/value pair

Mailgun
Tag: single value
Metadata: key/value pair, referred to as "variables"

SendGrid
Tag: multiple values, referred to as "categories"
Metadata: key/value pair, referred to as "custom_args"

Amazon
Looks like tags/metadata is combined as "Tags"

This is great and much better implementation than#34766 I was focusing on Postmark (using this atm) and that code targets only that transport.

PostmarkApiTransport doesn't have asendEmail test, maybe you can add the one from my PRhttps://github.com/symfony/symfony/pull/34766/files#diff-e50347a040c466692646cd1e6b7fe257

I have thought of some alternate solutions to account for the provider differences. Both would require knowledge of the transport when creating the email (which doesn't seem unreasonable).

1. A singleMetadataHeader that takes a free form array. Providers would have knowledge of how to parse this array. This would be added as a json encodedX-Metadata header for providers that don't support this. This is the most generic solution but complex from a usage perspective.

   $email->getHeaders()->addMetadata(['tag' =>'password-reset','metadata' => ['Color' =>'blue','Client-Id' =>'12345',    ],]);

2. Each provider can define it's own header(s) (that would live in the bridge):PostmarkHeader,MailgunHeader, etc.

   $email->getHeaders()->add((newPostmarkHeader())    ->tag('password-reset')    ->metadata(['Color' =>'blue','Client-Id' =>'12345',    ]));

   Or multiple headers:

   $email->getHeaders()->add(newPostmarkTag('password-reset'));$email->getHeaders()->add(newPostmarkMetadata(['Color' =>'blue','Client-Id' =>'12345',]));

   This would allow us to utilize all the different features of each provider in a way that is easy for the user to use.

My vote would be foroption 2.

Hmm I think option 2 adds much more complexity.
I think option 1 or current implementation in PR would work better, because it doesn't require custom code for providers in app's code.

For example, with option 2 emails are created and sent by adding specific tags "PostmarkTag/PostmarkHeader". If email transport is changed later for a project, instead of changing the project's config now it requires code changes too.
At the moment I use Postmark for a project, but may change this to Sendgrid later. I'm using Mailer exactly for this reason, to change only the config once, and don't worry about how emails are created.

More genericHeaders like Tag or Metadata are better in this case, and each transport uses this as it sees fit.

It looks like SendGrid has more options than just tags and metadata, they have personalizations and substitutions. The current PR implementation would not be able to provide these options. Option 1 would but if you switched providers, it would likely silently break in a way that isn't obvious. Option 2 would also break but in a more obvious way (there would be an exception because the header class would be missing).

Maybe the best course is to stick with the current PR implementation since multiple providers can support it and possibly add custom provider headers later?

I have moved the new Header classes to the Mailer component per@fabpot's request. I updated the PR description.

I have confirmed this works on Postmark but I don't use Mailgun. I'd appreciate someone with a Mailgun account to test.

If this is acceptable, I will add tests.

Sendgrid user here, I'll take a look at this asap, it might fix#34700

I made the changes and added tests. The tests are failing on travis (deps=low). Can I get some direction on how to fix?

Again, I don't feel confident in the Mailgun implementation as I can't do a live test but Postmark works as expected.

Mandrill (Mailchimp) also support these features (multiple values are supported for tags). Here are their doc:

• https://mandrillapp.com/api/docs/messages.JSON.html#method=send for the endpoint used by our ApiTransport
• https://mandrill.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/205582117-How-to-Use-SMTP-Headers-to-Customize-Your-Messages#tag-your-messages for the SMTP doc about tags
• https://mandrill.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/205582117-How-to-Use-SMTP-Headers-to-Customize-Your-Messages#use-custom-metadata for the SMTP doc about metadata

To fix the tests, you need to require at Mailer 5.1 for the bridges so that the new headers exist.

Ok, travis has been fixed.

@kbond Can you try to do the same for Mandrill with the docs suggested by@stof? It not, happy to merge as is and let someone else take over for the other transport providers.

Ok, I added Mandrill support for this feature. Again, I have not "live" tested this.

Mailgun and Mandrill both have anHttpTransport - this PR does not add tag/metadata support to these. Since these transports send the raw headers, it should work if using the proper header names for each service.edit: it should be possibly to add support to these using the same logic as the SmtpTransports, let me know if you'd like me to add before merging.

@kbond I think having support in HttpTransport classes as you describe would be good for consistency. Last thing to do before merge :)

Ok, added support for Mandrill/Mailgun Http Transports. I added 2 traits to reduce duplication.

Thank you@kbond.