Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork9.7k
Properly handle optional tag attributes for !tagged_iterator#32604
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Conversation
nicolas-grekas commentedJul 18, 2019
(tests fail) |
When using the array syntax
apfelbox commentedJul 18, 2019 • edited
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
edited
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
@nicolas-grekas I wrote the test apparently for Symfony 4.4+, not 4.2. Should I send a separate PR for 4.4+, where I just rename |
fabpot commentedJul 18, 2019
Should it be merged in 4.2 or 4.3? |
nicolas-grekas left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
(4.3)
nicolas-grekas commentedJul 18, 2019
Thank you@apfelbox. |
…or (apfelbox)This PR was merged into the 4.3 branch.Discussion----------Properly handle optional tag attributes for !tagged_iterator| Q | A| ------------- | ---| Branch? | 4.3| Bug fix? | yes| New feature? | no <!-- please update src/**/CHANGELOG.md files -->| BC breaks? | no <!-- seehttps://symfony.com/bc -->| Deprecations? |no <!-- please update UPGRADE-*.md and src/**/CHANGELOG.md files -->| Tests pass? | yes <!-- please add some, will be required by reviewers -->| Fixed tickets |#32603| License | MIT| Doc PR | —Properly handles all optional array keys when using `!tagged_iterator` in YAML service definitions.This fixes a regression and adds a test case preventing it from coming up againCommits-------d1c6580 Properly handle optional tag attributes for !tagged_iterator
apfelbox commentedJul 19, 2019
@nicolas-grekas should I prepare a follow up PR for 4.4, or will you fix the test when merging up? |
nicolas-grekas commentedJul 19, 2019
It's already merged up :) |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Properly handles all optional array keys when using
!tagged_iteratorin YAML service definitions.This fixes a regression and adds a test case preventing it from coming up again