Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork9.7k
[Validator] Fixed grouped composite constraints#29499
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Conversation
3adf789 tob53d911Comparestof commentedDec 8, 2018
Thanks@HeahDude. |
This PR was merged into the 3.4 branch.Discussion----------[Validator] Fixed grouped composite constraints| Q | A| ------------- | ---| Branch? | 3.4| Bug fix? | yes| New feature? | no| BC breaks? | no| Deprecations? | no| Tests pass? | yes| Fixed tickets |#17675,#25888,#23480| License | MIT| Doc PR | ~From Lisbon :). Thanks@stof,@xabbuh for your help to finally fix this old issue.Commits-------b53d911 [Validator] Fixed grouped composite constraints
backbone87 commentedDec 10, 2018
I think this change completely obsoletes the caching. I am not sure, but a constraint that has two grps would now be validated twice, if the both grps are the validation target. |
xabbuh commentedDec 10, 2018
Most constraints don't extend the |
backbone87 commentedDec 12, 2018
Yes you are right, i was desperately searching for the check for |
conradkleinespel commentedMay 2, 2019 • edited
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
edited
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Thanks for the fix@stof ! Just FYI, I think (I'm still investigating) this might have been a breaking change for us. Suddenly, some of our forms return unexpected validation errors. I think our code depended on this bug. Hopefully the fix should be quick. Nevertheless it is a bit surprising to see this in a patch release. I think we might have to check every single validation rule that uses collections in our project, because some previously unknown validations might come into action silently, preventing customers from doing things that were previously possible. |
From Lisbon :). Thanks@stof,@xabbuh for your help to finally fix this old issue.