Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

[LDAP] Revamp LDAP options with nested options definition#28839

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account

Merged
fabpot merged 1 commit intosymfony:masterfromyceruto:ldap_nested_options
Oct 12, 2018

Conversation

@yceruto
Copy link
Member

QA
Branch?master
Bug fix?no
New feature?no
BC breaks?no
Deprecations?no
Tests pass?yes
Fixed tickets-
LicenseMIT
Doc PR-

Next move after#27291 :)

This will work exactly that before, nothing change regarding behavior, BUT now we'veless code andintuitive definition of nested options.

@fabpot
Copy link
Member

Thank you@yceruto.

@fabpotfabpot merged commita26c284 intosymfony:masterOct 12, 2018
fabpot added a commit that referenced this pull requestOct 12, 2018
…n (yceruto)This PR was merged into the 4.2-dev branch.Discussion----------[LDAP] Revamp LDAP options with nested options definition| Q             | A| ------------- | ---| Branch?       | master| Bug fix?      | no| New feature?  | no| BC breaks?    | no| Deprecations? | no| Tests pass?   | yes| Fixed tickets | -| License       | MIT| Doc PR        | -Next move after#27291 :)This will work exactly that before, nothing change regarding behavior, BUT now we've *less code* and *intuitive definition of nested options*.Commits-------a26c284 Revamp LDAP options with nested definition
@ycerutoyceruto deleted the ldap_nested_options branchOctober 12, 2018 16:04
"ext-ldap":"*"
},
"conflict": {
"symfony/options-resolver":"<4.2"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

adding this is useless, constraint in require section already guarantees it

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@fabpotfabpotfabpot approved these changes

+1 more reviewer

@ostroluckyostroluckyostrolucky left review comments

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

No one assigned

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@yceruto@fabpot@ostrolucky@carsonbot

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp