I have another outputs for this list, which do you prefer?

• (A):@namespace: path (it looks more like how one use it@) (current PR)
• (B):path: namespace (it looks more like how one define it intwig.paths configuration,yaml's style)
• (C):path: @namespace (it looks like both A & B together)

For the record, I prefer the current version (A).

Outputting namespace first looks better to me (so A), as what is important is the different paths related to a given namespace. Paths used for separate namespaces are irrelevant regarding their order

Updated screenshot in description with the latest changes.

I find using* before each path and TableSeparator between each namespace really cluttering. :/

Which of the following outputs would you prefer?

1. Asterisk bullets, with separator (current)

   
2. No bullet, with separator

   
3. Asterisk bullets, no separator

   
4. Dash bullets, no separator

   
5. No bullet, no separator

   
6. Dash bullets with blank separator (as proposed below)

   
7. Dash bullets with blank separator only if needed (as proposed below)

   

My own vote would go to 4 or 5 (but 7's not bad, that's true 😄).

and 6 :) (Dash bullets with blank separator) as proposed above :)

7. Dash bullets with blank separator only if needed.
   

The problem I see with no row separator is that there is no grouping view per namespace, so one could get confused (missing namespace 😕)

My vote is for 7.

What about a--layout=[1-7] option :) And definitely support for layout=random 😂

7 is nice, agree with@yceruto; you getter a better view of path inheritance per namespace.

Tend to prefer(Main) / (Root) over(None) and have it on top.

edit: on 2nd thought (None) is fine :)

Thank you@yceruto.