Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork9.7k
Fix two edge cases in ResponseCacheStrategy#23129
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
Closed
mpdude wants to merge2 commits intosymfony:2.7fromwebfactory:fix-handling-noncacheable-embedded-response
Closed
Fix two edge cases in ResponseCacheStrategy#23129
mpdude wants to merge2 commits intosymfony:2.7fromwebfactory:fix-handling-noncacheable-embedded-response
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ContributorAuthor
mpdude commentedJun 14, 2017
Rebased to resolve conflicts after#23123 merged into 2.7 |
Member
fabpot commentedJun 14, 2017
Thank you@mpdude. |
fabpot added a commit that referenced this pull requestJun 14, 2017
This PR was squashed before being merged into the 2.7 branch (closes#23129).Discussion----------Fix two edge cases in ResponseCacheStrategy| Q | A| ------------- | ---| Branch? | 2.7| Bug fix? | yes| New feature? | no| BC breaks? | no| Deprecations? | no| Tests pass? | yes| Fixed tickets || License | MIT| Doc PR |While reviewing how `ResponseCacheStrategy` calculates the caching-related headers for responses that embed subrequests, I came across two cases that I think are currently implemented incorrectly.a) When the main response is public and cacheable with an expiration time, but it embeds (via ESI) a controller that does not set any caching-related headers, this embedded response is more constrained. So, the resulting (combined) response must not be cacheable, especially it may not keep the s-maxage.b) When the main response is public and cacheable with an expiration time, but it embeds (via ESI) a controller that explicitly creates a "private" response, the resulting (combined) response must be private as well.Commits-------c6e8c07 Fix two edge cases in ResponseCacheStrategy
This was referencedJul 3, 2017
Merged
Merged
Merged
Merged
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
While reviewing how
ResponseCacheStrategycalculates the caching-related headers for responses that embed subrequests, I came across two cases that I think are currently implemented incorrectly.a) When the main response is public and cacheable with an expiration time, but it embeds (via ESI) a controller that does not set any caching-related headers, this embedded response is more constrained. So, the resulting (combined) response must not be cacheable, especially it may not keep the s-maxage.
b) When the main response is public and cacheable with an expiration time, but it embeds (via ESI) a controller that explicitly creates a "private" response, the resulting (combined) response must be private as well.