Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

[FrameworkBundle] removed the Asset component dependency on FrameworkBundle#20067

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account

Merged
fabpot merged 1 commit intosymfony:masterfromfabpot:asset-dep-frameworkbundle
Sep 28, 2016

Conversation

@fabpot
Copy link
Member

@fabpotfabpot commentedSep 28, 2016
edited
Loading

QA
Branch?master
Bug fix?no
New feature?yes
BC breaks?no (except for people using FrameworkBundle without requiring symfony/symfony which should be pretty rare; and fixing this is easy by adding symfony/asset explicitly)
Deprecations?no
Tests pass?yes
Fixed tickets#15748 partially
LicenseMIT
Doc PRn/a

Trying to reduce the number of required dependencies on FrameworkBundle. This PR removes the Asset component from the list.

theofidry, linaori, Nicofuma, and derrabus reacted with thumbs up emoji
@xabbuh
Copy link
Member

👍

By the way, I do not think that this change will not be breaking some applications. In my experience there are way to many packages out there that require the FrameworkBundle instead of explicitly listing their dependencies. Probably, not many of them will break because of the missing Asset component, but we will probably have to expect some (a lot of) reports when doing similar changes with other component. Though maybe this helps to educate people to be more explicit with what their packages actually really need without pulling the whole universe.

* {@inheritdoc}
*/
publicfunctionisEnabled()
{
Copy link
Contributor

@jvasseurjvasseurSep 28, 2016
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

I don't think this command uses anything from the asset component and so could stay enabled if the component isn't installed.

xabbuh reacted with thumbs up emoji
Copy link
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

Oops, you're right, reverted

@fabpotfabpotforce-pushed theasset-dep-frameworkbundle branch fromc2ddb68 to1dd4e21CompareSeptember 28, 2016 13:52
@fabpotfabpot merged commit1dd4e21 intosymfony:masterSep 28, 2016
fabpot added a commit that referenced this pull requestSep 28, 2016
…cy on FrameworkBundle (fabpot)This PR was merged into the 3.2-dev branch.Discussion----------[FrameworkBundle] removed the Asset component dependency on FrameworkBundle| Q             | A| ------------- | ---| Branch?       | master| Bug fix?      | no| New feature?  | yes| BC breaks?    | no (except for people using FrameworkBundle without requiring symfony/symfony which should be pretty rare; and fixing this is easy by adding symfony/asset explicitly)| Deprecations? | no| Tests pass?   | yes| Fixed tickets |#15748 partially| License       | MIT| Doc PR        | n/aTrying to reduce the number of required dependencies on FrameworkBundle. This PR removes the Asset component from the list.Commits-------1dd4e21 [FrameworkBundle] removed the Asset component dependency on FrameworkBundle
@fabpotfabpot deleted the asset-dep-frameworkbundle branchSeptember 28, 2016 14:38
@fabpotfabpot mentioned this pull requestOct 27, 2016
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in to comment

Reviewers

1 more reviewer

@jvasseurjvasseurjvasseur left review comments

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

No one assigned

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@fabpot@xabbuh@jvasseur@carsonbot

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp