Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork9.7k
[DI][2.7] Include dynamic services in alternatives#19685
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Conversation
ogizanagi commentedAug 20, 2016
Status: Reviewed |
ro0NL commentedAug 20, 2016 • edited
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
edited
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
This will include possible private services as well, but those are still allowed to |
ogizanagi commentedAug 20, 2016
@ro0NL : And it was already the case anyway, isn't it ? |
ro0NL commentedAug 20, 2016
I guess it depends.. if it was already initialized yes/no. This will include by definition, not by state. |
nicolas-grekas commentedAug 22, 2016
👍 |
1 similar comment
stof commentedAug 22, 2016
👍 |
nicolas-grekas commentedAug 23, 2016
Thank you@ro0NL. |
This PR was merged into the 2.7 branch.Discussion----------[DI][2.7] Include dynamic services in alternatives| Q | A| ------------- | ---| Branch? | 2.7| Bug fix? | yes| New feature? | no| BC breaks? | no| Deprecations? | no| Tests pass? | yes| Fixed tickets | comma-separated list of tickets fixed by the PR, if any| License | MIT| Doc PR | reference to the documentation PR, if anyCommits-------428b5cc include dynamic services in list of alternatives
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.