Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork9.7k
[HttpFoundation] Set the Content-Range header if the requested Range is unsatisfied#18080
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
Merged
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Member
fabpot commentedMar 10, 2016
Thank you@jakzal. |
fabpot added a commit that referenced this pull requestMar 10, 2016
…sted Range is unsatisfied (jakzal)This PR was merged into the 2.3 branch.Discussion----------[HttpFoundation] Set the Content-Range header if the requested Range is unsatisfied| Q | A| ------------- | ---| Branch | 2.3| Bug fix? | yes| New feature? | no| BC breaks? | no| Deprecations? | no| Tests pass? | yes| Fixed tickets | -| License | MIT| Doc PR | -This is a followup to#17150 (comment)[RFC2616](http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec10.html) specifies the Content-Range header SHOULD be included with a *416 Requested Range Not Satisfiable* response:> When this status code is returned for a byte-range request, the response SHOULD include a Content-Range entity-header field specifying the current length of the selected resource (see section 14.16). This response MUST NOT use the multipart/byteranges content- type.[RFC 7233](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7233#section-4.2) specifies what should be the header's value. It's in the "Request for comments" state, but it's the best definition I could find. This value is valid according to rfc2616 as well.Commits-------54329d8 [HttpFoundation] Set the Content-Range header if the requested Range is unsatisfied
Merged
This was referencedMar 25, 2016
Merged
Closed
Merged
Merged
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a followup to#17150 (comment)
RFC2616 specifies the Content-Range header SHOULD be included with a416 Requested Range Not Satisfiable response:
RFC 7233 specifies what should be the header's value. It's in the "Request for comments" state, but it's the best definition I could find. This value is valid according to rfc2616 as well.