Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork9.7k
[DependencyInjection] Added support for closure as a factory method#11968
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Conversation
7ff4be2 to958ab11Compare958ab11 to000b348Compare000b348 to75fac20Comparefabpot commentedSep 24, 2014
2.6 is going to have a new better way to register factories. See#12008 |
unkind commentedSep 24, 2014
Yes, that PR looks nice. I'll fix and rebase my PR after merging that one. |
stof commentedSep 24, 2014
I agree this should wait for#12008. Defining a closure in factoryMethod is wrong, as a closure is not a method. |
stof commentedSep 25, 2014
@unkind the PR has been merged |
unkind commentedSep 26, 2014
That's good. I'll make my changes this weekend. |
unkind commentedSep 27, 2014
I wait for#12065. |
unkind commentedOct 3, 2014
I've opened new PR:#12115. |
I've detached closure's part from#11953. Furthermore, there is no SuperClosure dependency anymore, because I'm not sure if I have to create bridge package by myself.