Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork4.6k
fix: don't reexecute derived with no dependencies on teardown#16438
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
Open
dummdidumm wants to merge1 commit intomainChoose a base branch fromprops-derived-teardown-fix
base:main
Could not load branches
Branch not found:{{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline, and old review comments may become outdated.
+77 −2
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
changeset-botbot commentedJul 18, 2025 • edited
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
edited
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
🦋 Changeset detectedLatest commit:1b074f2 The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump. This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
Not sure what this means?Click here to learn what changesets are. Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR |
|
The prior logic was wrong because it reexecuted when something was clean, but we want to when it's not. The remaining fix was to also check the reactions: If an effect is destroyed and it was the last reaction of a derived then the derived is set to `MAYBE_DIRTY`. We therefore also need to check if the derived still has anyone listening to it, and only then reexecute it.Fixes#16363
9c70be3
to1b074f2
CompareSign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
The prior logic was wrong because it reexecuted when something was clean, but we want to when it's not. The remaining fix was to also check the reactions: A derived is set to
MAYBE_DIRTY
if it doesn't have any reactions anymore as a result of e.g. an effect that listened to it tearing down. We don't want to rerun in that case.Fixes#16363
Before submitting the PR, please make sure you do the following
feat:
,fix:
,chore:
, ordocs:
.packages/svelte/src
, add a changeset (npx changeset
).Tests and linting
pnpm test
and lint the project withpnpm lint