Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

Support noDeploy option when use layers#759

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account

Open
naoyasugita wants to merge7 commits intoserverless:master
base:master
Choose a base branch
Loading
fromnaoyasugita:enable-noDeploy-option-with-layer

Conversation

naoyasugita
Copy link

This change allows use of noDeploy option with the layers.

Should resolve:
#577

emann, markkvdb, mateus-pd, kaiosyng, and whitfin reacted with rocket emoji
@emann
Copy link

Thank you@naoyasugita! I need this as well, looking forward to it being merged.

naoyasugita and kaiosyng reacted with thumbs up emoji

@naoyasugita
Copy link
Author

Hi@pgrzesik - I'd be happy to check in with you when you're ready.

@kaiosyng
Copy link

I hope this gets merged soon!

naoyasugita and paulalex reacted with thumbs up emoji

Copy link
Contributor

@pgrzesikpgrzesik left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

Thanks for proposing the fix and sorry for not responding sooner. Please see my comment and let me know what do you think. Also, would be good if we could have a test case covering this.

naoyasugita reacted with thumbs up emoji
* @param {Object} noDeploy
* @return {Promise} a promise offering the original JSZip object.
*/
function addTreeNoDeploy(zip, src, noDeploy) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

I think we don't need a new function just for that as most of the logic is copied over from the originaladdTree. I think it would be better to just have the optional argument ofnoDeploy to the original function. What do you think?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

Thanks for the review :)
You are right. I'll fix it along with the test.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

@pgrzesik I'm done adding test and fixing the code. Please check it out.

pgrzesik reacted with thumbs up emoji
@pgrzesik
Copy link
Contributor

Hey@naoyasugita - it looks like the tests are currently failing. Could you please look into that whenever you have a chance? 🙇

naoyasugita, iteratelance, and whitfin reacted with thumbs up emoji

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@pgrzesikpgrzesikpgrzesik left review comments

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants
@naoyasugita@emann@kaiosyng@pgrzesik

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp