Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

flake: switch tohercules-ci/flake-parts#229

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account

Closed
drupol wants to merge1 commit intoserokell:masterfromdrupol:switch-to-flake-parts
Closed

flake: switch tohercules-ci/flake-parts#229

drupol wants to merge1 commit intoserokell:masterfromdrupol:switch-to-flake-parts

Conversation

@drupol
Copy link

Hi,

I have been working with Deploy RS for some time now. Recently, I noticed an opportunity to modernize theflake.nix file.

The modifications I've made primarily focus on switching fromnumtide/flake-utils tohercules-ci/flake-parts.

If these modifications align with your vision for the project, I would be honored to see them implemented. Of course, I am open to any feedback and willing to make further adjustments as needed.

Scrumplex, MrFoxPro, and isabelroses reacted with thumbs up emoji
@PhilTaken
Copy link
Collaborator

Not sure if this is necessary, it works as it is. Change for the sake of change feels weird.

@Skarlett
Copy link

Here is a bare minimum flake-module which describes deploy-rs for flake-parts. It currently is under testing and may change without notice.

https://github.com/the-computer-club/lynx/tree/main-docs/flake-modules/deploy-rs

drupol, Munksgaard, and pedorich-n reacted with thumbs up emoji

@drupoldrupol closed thisJan 28, 2024
@drupoldrupol deleted the switch-to-flake-parts branchJanuary 28, 2024 18:38
@drupol
Copy link
Author

Not sure if this is necessary, it works as it is. Change for the sake of change feels weird.

No problem.

@ScrumplexScrumplex mentioned this pull requestApr 5, 2024
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@drupol@PhilTaken@Skarlett

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp