Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork26k
-
I started this to collect comments, complaints or suggestions for improvements about Github Discussions. Note Github Discussions is beta and evolving, seeGithub Discussions feed-back for feature requests and comments There are a few things that we can change in scikit-learn Github Discussions like categories: General, Q&A, Ideas, Show and Tell. |
BetaWas this translation helpful?Give feedback.
All reactions
Replies: 2 comments 4 replies
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
-
Few limitations I can see for now:
Old pain points that have been fixed since this post was created:
|
BetaWas this translation helpful?Give feedback.
All reactions
👍 2
-
Good points. Discussions seem like issues. I suppose that soon they will add the back reference to issues. |
BetaWas this translation helpful?Give feedback.
All reactions
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
-
I commented on this:community/community#3211 (comment) The feeling I get is that they started a bit afresh with Discussions. At the beginning my mental model was that Discussions were Issues plus answer/unaswered boolean flag (and some forum-like features on top of it). The more it goes, the more I realise this is not that simple. For example adding labels does not seem that simplecommunity/community#19 and may take some time to be implemented. |
BetaWas this translation helpful?Give feedback.
All reactions
👍 1
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
-
In general, I think scikit-learn/Discussions must become a place of a clear purpose and usefulness. At the moment, Discussions seems like everything and nothing (also barely alive). In my opinion, the best way to define the purpose of Discussions is to list Discussionsamong the mailing list, StackOverflow, stats.SE, and gitter, which will help to ensure that the scopes of these channels of communication do not overlap too much. In particular, I'd like Discussions to become the place for aspiring or beginner contributors to seek answers from maintainers and core developers, asDeveloper's Guide cannot document all aspects. The kind ofquestions I asked, I believe, is more suitable here than on StackOverflow (these questions are specific to the current scikit-learn CI setup and development practices). Also, answers are found much more easily on a discussion board or forum than in a chat room or mailing list (I could not find the search function on gitter at all!). I suggest to create a separate category: "Q&A for new contributors", and give it a year or so to see if it takes off. |
BetaWas this translation helpful?Give feedback.
All reactions
👍 1
-
Office hours seems to be a good place for this. The next one is on May 2nd:#23070
Feel free to open a PR adding Discussions to the list! Right now, I think most people are directed to Discussions through our issue template that tries to push people towards Discussions for generic questions rather than opening an issue. Concerning searchability I agree that gitter is poor, I personally rarely check gitter out, but this is quite subjective and different people will have different opinions on this. |
BetaWas this translation helpful?Give feedback.
All reactions
-
The Office Hours sound great (especially the pair programming part), but have a disadvantage of being once in a while, which means that one has to wait in order to ask a question. Besides, the answers aren't made permanently available to a wider audience or searchable. |
BetaWas this translation helpful?Give feedback.