@sbcgua will you be dropping 702 compatibility?

@larshp I'm pronenot to. But I'm not using this lib currently in my projects in our old system. So ... it depends on who uses it and where. How to find it out ? Maybe we can move 740 support into a branch ?

@DerGuteWolf Could you pls tell what is your reasoning behind this PR ?

it might be a good example for automatically downporting using abaplint if needed

it might be a good example for automatically downporting using abaplint if needed

@larshp
I think it is a good case. Let's make a branch for 740 then after this PR is merged. The above changes are not automatable by the way - it is a replacement of macros.

describe is not allowed in steampunk, therefore the reason to remove this. Also Macros are not allowed in steampunk, therefore I substituted macros with VALUE construction expressions

Thanks !

describe is not allowed in steampunk, therefore the reason to remove this

Would you mind if I ask you to measure the perf before and after and publish here ? If I remember well the test prog is already created - perf_test.prog - though it might need this -https://github.com/sbcgua/benchmarks - I don't remember for sure

Would you mind if I ask you to measure the perf before and after and publish here ?

Will do this, however I need some shuffling around first.

With describe

With RTTI

40% slower :( eh ...

OK.

1. Merged into a separate branch - steampunk
2. Added a reference to the main readme -https://github.com/sbcgua/abap_mustache/tree/master#versions

@DerGuteWolf Thanks for the PR !
@larshp feel free to PR experiments with auto up-porting. I guess current UTs are able to withstand that. :)