Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

Added some docs and an example for how to use the APIC#460

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account

Draft
Radu-Voinea wants to merge5 commits intorust-osdev:main
base:main
Choose a base branch
Loading
fromRadu-Voinea:main

Conversation

Radu-Voinea
Copy link

I do believe that this could be useful when migrating from version 0.9 to version 0.11, as well as a quick way to get things going if starting from nothing.

ChocolateLoverRaj reacted with thumbs up emojiSauravMaheshkar reacted with heart emoji
@Freax13
Copy link
Member

Thank you for your contribution!

I'm not sure if we should adopt this example: This example goes way beyond what's needed to get started in setting up a small kernel with the bootloader. I'm not sure if we want this repo to serve as a place for various examples of next-steps one could take in kernel dev.

Perhaps this is better suited for thex2apic crate. Maybe it could live in its own repo entirely.

@Radu-Voinea
Copy link
Author

Hi there, thank you a lot for taking the time to look into this
I do understand that it might be a bit complex for a small kernel, but these were what I needed to port the 0.9 blog version to the 0.11 current version and would have liked to have had them just be available somewhere so I can read thru them. I do find that especially some of the structs that hold all the values are unnecessary for a small startup and would be more than happy to remove them along side any otherfuture proofing

@Radu-VoineaRadu-Voinea marked this pull request as draftOctober 31, 2024 11:09
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

It would be nicer to look at on GitHub if this was calledREADME.md

@ChocolateLoverRaj
Copy link
Contributor

I'm not sure if we want this repo to serve as a place for various examples of next-steps one could take in kernel dev.

It doesn't have to be in this repo, but it is actually a very cool idea to have various examples of next steps. It would be very helpful. There are many people who are followinghttps://os.phil-opp.com/, are done reading edition-2, are done reading edition-3 so far, and are figuring out how to do things rather than waiting for more stuff in edition-3. It would be very helpful if there was a place where people could share examples with each other.

@SauravMaheshkar
Copy link

I'm not sure if we want this repo to serve as a place for various examples of next-steps one could take in kernel dev.

It doesn't have to be in this repo, but it is actually a very cool idea to have various examples of next steps. It would be very helpful. There are many people who are followinghttps://os.phil-opp.com/, are done reading edition-2, are done reading edition-3 so far, and are figuring out how to do things rather than waiting for more stuff in edition-3. It would be very helpful if there was a place where people could share examples with each other.

Agree about various examples! It'd be nice if we could curate a list of other projects based onhttps://os.phil-opp.com/ that go beyond the blogs. Maybe a simple discussion thread on the original repositoryhttps://github.com/phil-opp/blog_os/discussions ?

ChocolateLoverRaj reacted with thumbs up emoji

@SauravMaheshkar
Copy link

PS: Would love to see a more minimal version of this in any way be it this repository, theblog_os project or anywhere else. This was really helpful to me. Thanks@Radu-Voinea

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@ChocolateLoverRajChocolateLoverRajChocolateLoverRaj requested changes

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants
@Radu-Voinea@Freax13@ChocolateLoverRaj@SauravMaheshkar

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp