Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

Implement prefetch data intrinsics#420

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account

Open
NCGThompson wants to merge1 commit intorust-lang:master
base:master
Choose a base branch
Loading
fromNCGThompson:minimal-prefetch

Conversation

NCGThompson
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes#414

It should probably have tests that should fail before the changes. What kind of test should I add?

I edited the builtin list in context.rs, and that might create a conflict when syncing with the rust repository.

@antoyo
Copy link
Contributor

It should probably have tests that should fail before the changes. What kind of test should I add?

Do you know what kind of tests there is for this in the LLVM codegen?

@NCGThompson
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

The codegen tests are probably the most thorough, but they are LLVM specific. However, according to the FileCheck documentation, it doesn't do much that can't be done with grep.

At a minimum though, I think we should check that the compiler can encounter the function without panicking.

@antoyo
Copy link
Contributor

At a minimum though, I think we should check that the compiler can encounter the function without panicking.

I would be OK with such a test. You can add itin this directory.

NCGThompson reacted with thumbs up emoji

@antoyo
Copy link
Contributor

Is this still a draft or should I review this PR?

@NCGThompsonNCGThompson marked this pull request as ready for reviewMarch 25, 2024 03:44
@antoyo
Copy link
Contributor

Oh, sorry, I didn't notice you marked this PR as ready for review (please ping me if I don't answer for some time: I can easily miss some things).

There are some conflicts to fix.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Minimal implimentation of prefetch
2 participants
@NCGThompson@antoyo

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp