Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork149
Closed
Description
The problem
It's a bittoo verbose to writeStyle.(array([| style1, style2 |])). This solution is nice, especially for zero-cost, but I have found something useful that might be added here.
Considered solution
Tuples are encoded as array by bucklescript. We could leverage this by adding methods similar to this:
external _2: (('a,'a)) =>'a = "%identity";external _3: (('a,'a,'a)) =>'a = "%identity";external _4: (('a,'a,'a,'a)) =>'a ="%identity";external _5: (('a,'a,'a,'a)) =>'a = "%identity";external _6: (('a,'a,'a,'a,'a)) =>'a = "%identity";external _2options: ((option('a), option('a))) =>'a ="%identity";external _3options: ((option('a), option('a), option('a))) =>'a ="%identity";external _4options: ((option('a), option('a), option('a), option('a))) =>'a = "%identity";external _5options: ((option('a), option('a), option('a), option('a))) =>'a ="%identity";external _6options: ((option('a), option('a), option('a), option('a), option('a))) =>'a ="%identity";
This might help to replace
Style.array([| style1, style2 |])
by
Style._2(style1, style2)
Open to ideas for the naming. I would like to something short since it's the purpose of this new methods :D
Alternatives solutions
More Ideas?
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels