- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork22.1k
Remove all deprecations from Action Pack#26746
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Changes from1 commit
d7be30e6c24e47a2762d9333bfd857e1c9979a5ea9c396a8c7093ceb31639ea98b83092a3718f174061053d2b73b3d41ea2ca83c4fda5afe1b975e6a3ff9db5860b359185b68eb52e5d092033dde9542aFile filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Jump to
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Diff view
Diff view
- Loading branch information
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -611,28 +611,8 @@ def init_with(coder) # :nodoc: | ||
| end | ||
| end | ||
| undef_method :to_param | ||
Contributor There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more. Should we still undef this? MemberAuthor There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more. I think so. The idea to undef this was to users not call Contributor There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more. 👌 | ||
| protected | ||
| attr_reader :parameters | ||