- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork26.3k
Exporttorch::utils::tensor_to_numpy#154178
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Conversation
pytorch-botbot commentedMay 23, 2025 • edited
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
edited
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results athud.pytorch.org/pr/154178
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ❗ 1 Active SEVsThere are 1 currently active SEVs. If your PR is affected, please view them below: ✅ You can merge normally! (1 Unrelated Failure)As of commitec0ab31 with merge based8e4c1c ( UNSTABLE - The following job is marked as unstable, possibly due to flakiness on trunk:
This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
shink commentedMay 23, 2025
@pytorchbot label "topic: not user facing" |
shink commentedMay 23, 2025
I got this in this case: |
albanD left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
SGTM!
Do you need tensor_from_numpy() as well?
Skylion007 commentedMay 25, 2025
@pytorchbot merge |
pytorchmergebot commentedMay 25, 2025
Merge startedYour change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours). Learn more about merging in thewiki. Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to thePyTorch DevX Team |
pytorchmergebot commentedMay 25, 2025
Merge failedReason: 1 mandatory check(s) failed. The first few are: Dig deeper byviewing the failures on hud |
youkaichao left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
do we need to addTORCH_API for the functions below? likeis_numpy_scalar,is_numpy_bool,is_numpy_int,is_numpy_available etc.
shink commentedMay 27, 2025
@pytorchbot rebase -b main |
shink commentedMay 27, 2025
Sorry for the late. Have updated. |
pytorchmergebot commentedMay 27, 2025
@pytorchbot started a rebase job ontorefs/remotes/origin/main. Check the current statushere |
pytorchmergebot commentedMay 27, 2025
Successfully rebased |
c123f9f toaba8c9dCompareshink commentedMay 28, 2025
@pytorchbot merge |
Pull workflow has not been scheduled for the PR yet. It could be because author doesn't have permissions to run those or skip-checks keywords were added to PR/commits, aborting merge. Please get/give approval for the workflows and/or remove skip ci decorators before next merge attempt. If you think this is a mistake, please contact PyTorch Dev Infra. |
shink commentedMay 29, 2025
@pytorchbot merge |
Pull workflow has not been scheduled for the PR yet. It could be because author doesn't have permissions to run those or skip-checks keywords were added to PR/commits, aborting merge. Please get/give approval for the workflows and/or remove skip ci decorators before next merge attempt. If you think this is a mistake, please contact PyTorch Dev Infra. |
youkaichao commentedMay 30, 2025
@albanD how to help merge this PR? |
shink commentedJun 3, 2025
@pytorchbot merge |
Pull workflow has not been scheduled for the PR yet. It could be because author doesn't have permissions to run those or skip-checks keywords were added to PR/commits, aborting merge. Please get/give approval for the workflows and/or remove skip ci decorators before next merge attempt. If you think this is a mistake, please contact PyTorch Dev Infra. |
albanD commentedJun 3, 2025
@pytorchbot merge |
Pull workflow has not been scheduled for the PR yet. It could be because author doesn't have permissions to run those or skip-checks keywords were added to PR/commits, aborting merge. Please get/give approval for the workflows and/or remove skip ci decorators before next merge attempt. If you think this is a mistake, please contact PyTorch Dev Infra. |
albanD commentedJun 3, 2025
@shink would you be able to rebase on latest trunk to properly trigger CI please? Then we should be able to merge! |
shink commentedJun 4, 2025
@pytorchbot rebase -b main |
pytorchmergebot commentedJun 4, 2025
@pytorchbot started a rebase job ontorefs/remotes/origin/main. Check the current statushere |
pytorchmergebot commentedJun 4, 2025
Successfully rebased |
aba8c9d toec0ab31Compareshink commentedJun 4, 2025
@pytorchbot merge |
pytorchmergebot commentedJun 4, 2025
Merge startedYour change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours). Learn more about merging in thewiki. Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to thePyTorch DevX Team |
cyyever commentedJun 4, 2025
@pytorchbot merge -i |
pytorchmergebot commentedJun 4, 2025
The mergejob was canceled or timed out. This most often happen if two merge requests were issued for the same PR, or if merge job was waiting for more than 6 hours for tests to finish. In later case, please do not hesitate to reissue the merge command |
pytorchmergebot commentedJun 4, 2025
Merge startedYour change will be merged while ignoring the following 1 checks:pull / linux-jammy-py3-clang12-executorch / build Learn more about merging in thewiki. Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to thePyTorch DevX Team |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Fixes#154105
cc:@albanD